Information between 7th December 2025 - 16th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted Aye and against the House One of 13 Crossbench Aye votes vs 20 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted Aye and in line with the House One of 26 Crossbench Aye votes vs 18 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted No and against the House One of 4 Crossbench No votes vs 3 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted Aye and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench Aye votes vs 16 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 132 Noes - 124 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted No and against the House One of 7 Crossbench No votes vs 8 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted Aye and in line with the House One of 8 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted Aye and against the House One of 7 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted No and in line with the House One of 29 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted No and in line with the House One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 12 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted Aye and in line with the House One of 15 Crossbench Aye votes vs 20 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted No and against the House One of 9 Crossbench No votes vs 20 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Mawson voted No and against the House One of 13 Crossbench No votes vs 27 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Mawson speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Mawson contributed 1 speech (86 words) Committee stage part one Wednesday 17th December 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Companies House: Proof of Identity
Asked by: Lord Mawson (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 16th December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what platforms were considered for Companies House's identity verification service, and on what grounds GOV.UK One Login was selected. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Companies House sought invitations from service providers and conducted a robust assessment against critical success factors concerning user experience, value for money, affordability for users and viability of delivery. GOV.UK One Login was selected because it satisfied these critical success factors and aligned with wider government priorities to utilise cross government verification solutions where possible to streamline access government services as set out below: www.gov.uk/guidance/use-govuk-one-login To ensure that all customers were able to access identity verification, a secondary route was put in place in the form of Authorised Company Service Providers (ACSPs). |
|
Companies House: Proof of Identity
Asked by: Lord Mawson (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 16th December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of the GOV.UK One Login in-person Post Office option for Companies House's identity verification service. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Post Office option is provided under the GOV.UK One Login Service. Companies House understands Government Digital Service undertook a robust analysis to ensure the option achieved the same identity verification standard as other identity verification journeys within the GOV.UK One Login service. Companies House works closely with the GOV.UK One Login team to monitor success rates through this route, along with sharing customer feedback and insight where relevant to improve the service. |
|
Companies House: Proof of Identity
Asked by: Lord Mawson (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 16th December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of GOV.UK One Login for Companies House's identity verification service, and how many complaints have been received about it. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) On 8 April 2025 Companies House started a lengthy period of voluntary Identity Verification to assess the effectiveness of the solution before making Identity Verification mandatory from 18 November. As of 9 December, 1.8 million people have successfully completed verification via GOV.UK One Login. Between 8 April and 9 December, Companies House received 355 official complaints regarding GOV.UK One Login. From September to November 2025, the period for which data is available of the Government Digital Service (GDS) received 75 complaints from Companies House customers using One Login to verify their identities. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
16 Dec 2025, 6:25 p.m. - House of Lords "defendants. As the noble Lord, Lord Mawson said. So of course, the court should have the power to " Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025
Oral Evidence - Enfield Council, and Belport New Towns: Creating Communities - Built Environment Committee Found: Bailey of Paddington; Lord Cameron of Dillington; Lord Faulkner of Worcester; Viscount Hanworth; Lord Mawson |