To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Tattooing
Tuesday 22nd January 2019

Asked by: Lord Palmer (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many tattoos have been removed at a cost to the NHS in England; and what is the total cost of such removals since 2009.

Answered by Baroness Manzoor

It is possible that tattoo removal procedures could be classified to a number of ‘skin excision’ codes within the OPCS-4 Classification. These procedures codes would be assigned for any type of skin excisions, for example, the removal of benign and malignant neoplasm. It is not possible to separately identify data specific to tattoo removal procedures.


Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jan 2019 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and against the House
One of 30 Crossbench No votes vs 27 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 208
Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 21 Jan 2019
Zimbabwe

Speech Link

View all Lord Palmer (XB - Excepted Hereditary) contributions to the debate on: Zimbabwe

Division Vote (Lords)
14 Jan 2019 - Brexit: Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and against the House
One of 23 Crossbench No votes vs 63 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 151
Division Vote (Lords)
10 Dec 2018 - Arrangement of Business - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and against the House
One of 37 Crossbench No votes vs 31 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 163
Division Vote (Lords)
3 Dec 2018 - Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and in line with the House
One of 33 Crossbench No votes vs 21 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 93 Noes - 198
Division Vote (Lords)
27 Nov 2018 - Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and against the House
One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 61 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
22 Oct 2018 - Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and against the House
One of 16 Crossbench No votes vs 32 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 185
Division Vote (Lords)
22 Oct 2018 - Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Palmer (XB) voted No and in line with the House
One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 25 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 185
Written Question
London North Eastern Railway
Thursday 12th July 2018

Asked by: Lord Palmer (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the cost of the advertising used to promote the rebranding of Virgin Trains to the London North Eastern Railway.

Answered by Baroness Sugg

The cost of advertising connected with brand awareness and the launch of London North Eastern Railway (LNER) was approximately £936,000, which includes print, radio and digital marketing. This activity was critical to ensure that customers were aware that the change from Virgin Trains East Coast to LNER would not involve any disruption to services and that the change did not lead to any loss of revenue. This level of marketing spend is comparable with that of other normal intercity train operators.