To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Wednesday 25th February 2015

Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they consider that the principles and prohibitions regarding eugenic practices in the Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine form part of the constitutional traditions common to member states of the European Union.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

The United Kingdom has not signed or ratified the Council of Europe’s Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.


Written Question
Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Thursday 19th June 2014

Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 14 May (WA 511), why they have no set date for the full ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

The Government does not support eugenic practices. It is not considered helpful to interpret the term ‘eugenic practices' other than by reference to its ordinarily understood meaning. Any attempt at a working definition would risk the unintentional exclusion of practices whose unacceptability is no less great than that of practices captured by such a definition.

As previously stated, in the United Kingdom, the complex nature of devolved responsibilities in this range of policy areas has delayed consideration of full ratification. In the meantime, the UK continues to take an active role in Council of Europe negotiations and development of relevant protocols.


Written Question
Genetics
Thursday 19th June 2014

Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 14 May (WA 511), and in the light of the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 8 April (WA 267) stating that they do not support eugenic practices in the United Kingdom, why they have no definitions of what these practices might be.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

The Government does not support eugenic practices. It is not considered helpful to interpret the term ‘eugenic practices' other than by reference to its ordinarily understood meaning. Any attempt at a working definition would risk the unintentional exclusion of practices whose unacceptability is no less great than that of practices captured by such a definition.

As previously stated, in the United Kingdom, the complex nature of devolved responsibilities in this range of policy areas has delayed consideration of full ratification. In the meantime, the UK continues to take an active role in Council of Europe negotiations and development of relevant protocols.


Written Question
Abortion
Thursday 19th June 2014

Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 14 May (WA 499), what is their assessment of whether issuing guidance by amending the wording of form HSA1 would represent an act of secondary legislation or a change in the Abortion Act 1967.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

Any changes to the wording of the HSA1 form, if needed, would require changes to secondary legislation. Such changes could not be introduced through guidance, which makes no changes to abortion legislation.


Written Question
Abortion
Wednesday 18th June 2014

Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the evidence cited in the article "An Increase in the Sex Ratio of Births to India-born Mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for Sex-Selective Abortion" by Sylvie Dubuc and David Coleman published in Population and Development Review, vol 33, No. 2 (June 2007), pp383–400.

Answered by Earl Howe - Shadow Deputy Leader of the House of Lords

This article is a useful addition to the evidence base around sex selective abortions.

On 23 May 2014 the Department published updated analysis of birth ratios for England and Wales 2008-2012. The analyses by country of birth and ethnicity did not offer evidence of sex selection taking place within England and Wales. A copy of the report has been placed in the Library. It is also available at:

www.gov.uk/government/publications/analysis-of-male-to-female-birth-ratios-in-the-uk-2008-to-2012.

The Department will repeat this analysis on an annual basis following publication of birth data and remain vigilant and receptive to reports of such practice.


Speech in Grand Committee - Thu 03 Apr 2014
Abortion

"My Lords, allowing sex-selective abortion would mean that the UK was sleep-walking into a full-blown eugenic society, flying full into the face of humanity and the gift of life. Gender-selective abortion, which is highly discriminatory against females, is not prohibited by any Act or any other legislative instrument nor, for …..."
Lord Patten - View Speech

View all Lord Patten (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Abortion

Speech in Grand Committee - Thu 03 Apr 2014
Abortion

"My noble friend, for whom I am full of admiration in every way, has said that the law forbids abortion on grounds of sex selection, and forbids pre-signing. However, there has never been a successful prosecution or, indeed, a prosecution of any sort. It seems to me that nothing at …..."
Lord Patten - View Speech

View all Lord Patten (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Abortion

Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 31 Jan 2013
South London Healthcare NHS Trust

"My Lords, I remember a particularly torrid period of campaigning in Lewisham when in the other place which almost led me to seek the assistance of the A&E department at Lewisham hospital. Does the Minister not agree that on every occasion, however understandable, attachments to institutions and to buildings that …..."
Lord Patten - View Speech

View all Lord Patten (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: South London Healthcare NHS Trust

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 15 Dec 2010
Hospices and Palliative Care Services

"My Lords, I am very happy to follow the noble Lord, Lord Judd, who put his finger with great accuracy on the importance of localism in support for hospice movements, whether in hospitals or hospices in the community—a point also reflected by my noble friend Lord Selborne. That localism underpins …..."
Lord Patten - View Speech

View all Lord Patten (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Hospices and Palliative Care Services