Information between 1st December 2025 - 20th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 201 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 82 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Randall of Uxbridge speeches from: Rare Cancers Bill
Lord Randall of Uxbridge contributed 1 speech (510 words) 2nd reading Friday 16th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Lord Randall of Uxbridge speeches from: UK Citizens in Venezuela
Lord Randall of Uxbridge contributed 1 speech (32 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Lords Chamber |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Drax Power Station: Timber
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the current subsidy arrangement with Drax includes support for burning old growth forest wood in its power station. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Sustainability criteria require biomass to be legally harvested, and comply with any applicable legislation in the countries of origin to protect primary forest and old growth areas. Old growth sources are not excluded as some jurisdictions permit harvesting for valid reasons, such as fire prevention or disease control.
We have not seen evidence that the bioenergy industry drives harvesting decisions as it accepts low-value residues which would otherwise become waste.
Nevertheless, we have introduced an explicit exclusion for primary material harvested in old-growth areas in the new contract to eliminate this risk. |
|
Drax Power Station: Timber
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government whether wood pellets sourced from old growth forests in Canada have been burned in the Drax Power Station in 2024 and 2025. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) We have not seen evidence that material sourced from old growth forests in Canada has been used for UK power generation and Drax has a policy of not sourcing directly from protected Old Growth Management Areas or Old Growth Deferral Areas in British Columbia.
Nevertheless, we have introduced an explicit exclusion for material harvested in old-growth areas in the new contract to eliminate this risk. Any breaches would result in significant financial penalties and could lead to termination of the contract. This will be enforced by enhanced assurance and audit arrangements. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 9th February 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |