To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 154
Division Vote (Lords)
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 209
Division Vote (Lords)
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 249 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243
Written Question
Donald Trump
Friday 23rd May 2025

Asked by: Lord Sarfraz (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they would support the nomination of President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his role in averting war between India and Pakistan.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development)

The award of the Nobel Peace Prize is a matter for the Nobel committee, and not for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

Division Vote (Lords)
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 158 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Sarfraz (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207
Written Question
Cable Systems: Security
Thursday 30th January 2025

Asked by: Lord Sarfraz (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the (1) physical, and (2) cyber, threats to cable landing stations in the UK; and what measures they are taking to ensure the resilience of those stations against potential disruption.

Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch

Cable landing stations are a critical part of the UK’s digital infrastructure, and the Government takes their security seriously. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) works closely with the National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) to identify and assess physical and cyber security risks to telecoms infrastructure, including cable landing stations. These assessments inform DSIT and wider Government policy, legislation and engagement with the sector.