To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
13 Sep 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 3 Independent Aye votes vs 3 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 146
Division Vote (Lords)
13 Sep 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted No and in line with the House
One of 5 Independent No votes vs 3 Independent Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 203
Division Vote (Lords)
13 Sep 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 5 Independent Aye votes vs 2 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 145
Division Vote (Lords)
13 Sep 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted No and in line with the House
One of 4 Independent No votes vs 3 Independent Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Sep 2023 - Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 6 Independent Aye votes vs 2 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 190
Written Question
Private Prosecutions
Wednesday 26th July 2023

Asked by: Lord Stone of Blackheath (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the trends in the funding of private prosecutions; and what steps they are taking to ensure that privately-funded prosecutions are not misused in ways that are counter to the public interest.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Under s.17 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 the court has the power to order the payment from central funds of such amount as the court considers reasonably sufficient to compensate the prosecutor for any expenses properly incurred by them in the proceedings.

Responsibility of assessing claims and administering payment of criminal claims out of central funds for work done in the magistrates’ court and Crown Court are assessed by the Legal Aid Agency’s (LAA) Criminal Cases Unit (CCU) unless the court summarily assesses the claim under s.17(2B) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.

Information about central funds expenditure, including private prosecutions, is published on a quarterly basis within the LAA’s official statistics. The statistics provide useful management information to inform policy and legislative changes. A copy of the relevant data is attached.

The Justice Select Committee (JSC) considered safeguards in private prosecutions in 2021. They found that private prosecutions are rigorously tested, and weak ones filtered out. The Government agrees that, in most cases, existing safeguards work to prevent private prosecutions being misused.

In accordance with recommendations set out in the JSC report a private prosecutions register has been established for the magistrates’ courts in England and Wales. This enables the court or an authorised legal adviser, deciding whether to issue a summons to commence proceedings, to identify whether an application has already been determined or has been made by a vexatious litigant so that it can, where appropriate, be refused expeditiously.

The Criminal Procedure Rules have been amended so that they list the circumstances in which magistrates’ courts may refuse to issue a summons. The rules now also require summonses that are issued on the application of a private prosecutor to identify the prosecutor. This is intended to make it easier for defendants to refer their case to the Director of Public Prosecutions to consider taking over the case under s.6(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.

As set out in its response to the JSC report, the Government is committed to introducing legislation to limit the amount of costs a private prosecutor can recover from central funds, mirroring the arrangements already in place for private paying defendants, where recoverable costs are capped at legal aid rates.


Division Vote (Lords)
18 Jul 2023 - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and against the House
One of 6 Independent Aye votes vs 3 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 216
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and against the House
One of 5 Independent Aye votes vs 5 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 217
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and against the House
One of 5 Independent Aye votes vs 3 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 213
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath (None) voted Aye and against the House
One of 7 Independent Aye votes vs 4 Independent No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 205