Online Safety Act 2023: Virtual Private Networks

Lord Young of Acton Excerpts

Monday 15th September 2025 Lords Chamber

[Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Con)]

My Lords—

[Lord Young of Acton (Con)]

My Lords, I declare my interest as the head of the Free Speech Union. As I am sure the—

[Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms and Chief Whip (Lord Kennedy of Southwark) (Lab Co-op)]

It is the turn of the Conservative Benches. Please make up your minds about which noble Lord will ask a question.

--- Later in debate ---

[Lord Young of Acton (Con)]

My Lords, as I am sure the Minister is aware, two of the duties in the Online Safety Act that are designed to safeguard free speech are those imposed on category 1 providers to not remove content of democratic importance and journalistic content. But those duties come into force only once Ofcom has drawn up a list of the category 1 providers and registered them. But Ofcom has not done that yet, which has led, I believe, to over-removal of content of democratic importance and journalistic content by the large social media platforms. Can the Minister tell us when Ofcom is likely to designate providers as category 1 so that those duties come into force and free speech is better protected?

[Lord Leong (Lab)]

My Lords, the UK has a proud and enduring tradition of free speech, and we remain fully committed to protecting it as a fundamental human right. In respect of the noble Lord’s question, I will have to write to him as to when Ofcom will make the classification. The Online Safety Act is not about censoring lawful opinions or stifling debate. Its purpose is to tackle illegal content and to ensure that children are better protected online. It does not and will not restrict lawful political speech or limit adults from accessing or posting content that is legal, even if others may find it offensive. Free speech in the UK is not only alive, it is safeguarded.