To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Ministry of Justice: Trade Unions
Friday 2nd March 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what percentage of workers employed directly by his Department belonged to a trade union in each of the last five years for which data is available.

Answered by Rory Stewart

The only data held on this is at December 2014 when the number of staff within the MoJ (including HMPPS) that were members of trades unions was 43,286 which equated to 63.21% of staff numbers. Following the removal of check-off as a method of payment for members to pay for union subscriptions, it is no longer possible for the department to verify the numbers of staff that are currently trade union members.


Written Question
Ministry of Justice: Zero Hours Contracts
Friday 2nd March 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many (a) full-time staff, (b) part-time staff, (c) temporary staff and (d) any other staff were employed directly by his Department on zero-hours contracts in each of the last eight years.

Answered by Rory Stewart

The table below shows the number of individuals working in MOJ and HMPPS who were placed on zero hours contracts over the specified time period. Currently those individuals on zero hours contracts within MOJ are scheduled court ushers who are working within HMCTS.

Snapshot date

Total

MOJ

HMPPS2

31/1/2017

21

21

0

31/12/2016

26

25

1

31/12/20151

30

27

3

31/01/2015

73

66

7

31/12/2013

120

120

0

31/12/2012

140

140

0

31/12/2011

172

172

0

  1. MOJ Snapshot of data taken in 12 month intervals on the 31st of December each year other than 2014 which is a snapshot on the 31st of January 2015. This is because of missing data.
  2. HMPPS data taken as a snapshot at 31st March of each year.

Written Question
Ministry of Justice: Fairtrade Initiative
Friday 2nd March 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of his Department's spend on day-to-day goods comprised fair trade products in each of the last eight years.

Answered by Rory Stewart

The information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.


Written Question
Ministry of Justice: Directors
Thursday 1st February 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, who the lead non-executive director and other non-executive director board members are in his Department.

Answered by Phillip Lee

The Department does not currently have a lead non-executive director following the appointment of Lord Theodore Agnew as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for the School System on 28 September 2017. Our current non-executive directors are Liz Doherty and Lizzie Noel. A recruitment process is underway to recruit a lead and other additional non-executive directors.


Written Question
Sentencing: Females
Tuesday 30th January 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of women have been given custodial sentences as a proportion of all sentences in each of the last five years.

Answered by Phillip Lee

The information can be found in the sentencing data tool in the annual publication, linked below:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2016

We are committed to doing all we can to address the issues around female offending so we can better protect the public and deliver more effective rehabilitation. That is why we plan to set out a strategy for female offenders, to improve outcomes and services for women in both the community and custody.


Written Question
Custodial Treatment: Females
Tuesday 30th January 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment he has made of the UK's comparative international position for custodian sentences given to female offenders as a proportion of all sentences in each of the last five years.

Answered by Phillip Lee

We are aware of independent assessments of female prison population internationally, such as the World Female Imprisonment List published by the Institute for Criminal Policy Research at Birkbeck, University of London.

We are committed to doing all we can to address the issues around female offending so we can better protect the public and deliver more effective rehabilitation. That is why we plan to set out a strategy for female offenders, to improve outcomes and services for women in both the community and custody, including how we can do more in the community so custody is only used when absolutely necessary.


Written Question
Sentencing: Females
Tuesday 30th January 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average cost to the public purse was of (a) community supervision and (b) custodial prison sentences for female prisoners in each year for which data is available.

Answered by Phillip Lee

Her Majesty’s Prisons and Probation Service (HMPPS) does not calculate separately the average cost of community supervision by gender. Additionally, the information recorded on the HMPPS central accounting system does not allow the identification of such costs.

In respect of information for average cost for female prisoners serving custodial prison sentences, HMPPS routinely publishes average costs per prisoner, costs per prison place and overall prison unit costs for each private and public sector prison in England and Wales, including all categories of the female estate. This information is produced on an annual basis and is published after the end of each financial year.

Information on prison expenditure for previous financial years can be accessed in the Prison and Probation Performance Statistics pages for each financial year on the www.gov.uk website. Prison unit costs can be found within the Excel document Costs per prison place and cost per prisoner by individual prison establishment in the ‘Cost by Establishment’ tab.

The most recent published figures for financial year 2016-17 can be accessed on the www.gov.uk website from the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistic s/prison-performance-statistics-2016-to-2017


Written Question
Sentencing: Females
Monday 29th January 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many female offenders received an immediate custodial sentence in each of the last seven years; and what the percentage change in that number was for each police force area in England and Wales in each of those years.

Answered by Phillip Lee

The number of female offenders sentenced to immediate custody in England and Wales, by police force area, from 2010 to 2016, can be viewed in the table below.

Court proceedings data, including sentencing outcomes, for 2017 is planned for publication in May 2018.

In recognition of the distinct needs of female offenders, we are developing a female offender strategy to improve outcomes for women in the community and in custody.

Female offenders sentenced to immediate custody, England and Wales, by Police Force Area, 2010 to 2016 (1)(2)

Force

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

London (3)

1,691

1,822

1,566

1,320

1,318

1,192

1,286

Cumbria

80

109

88

90

93

104

92

Lancashire

189

193

205

241

239

215

169

Merseyside

251

265

232

232

249

268

267

Greater Manchester

468

486

412

405

451

405

309

Cheshire

139

131

121

118

169

182

168

Northumbria

156

199

165

136

178

184

170

Durham

87

64

79

80

85

77

80

North Yorkshire

91

90

104

82

83

79

83

West Yorkshire

273

284

270

271

300

294

336

South Yorkshire

206

244

210

273

249

232

194

Humberside

151

155

157

146

158

138

147

Cleveland

116

91

93

98

91

78

108

West Midlands

630

580

590

493

536

525

559

Staffordshire

151

143

145

101

125

126

119

West Mercia

146

116

111

104

117

102

112

Warwickshire

28

39

38

40

41

57

60

Derbyshire

139

156

123

128

174

183

179

Nottinghamshire

187

153

145

117

143

170

147

Lincolnshire

52

59

62

67

42

52

67

Leicestershire

108

120

114

108

102

88

97

Northamptonshire

129

115

128

93

92

70

78

Cambridgeshire

143

111

123

132

92

89

113

Norfolk

96

99

93

73

86

99

124

Suffolk

56

81

43

64

79

73

49

Bedfordshire

99

75

84

42

69

80

54

Hertfordshire

95

109

107

100

93

89

110

Essex

231

223

197

194

201

162

176

Thames Valley

242

254

213

204

214

255

224

Hampshire

199

267

245

156

193

211

158

Surrey

94

99

113

82

90

64

63

Kent

206

226

193

201

203

192

217

Sussex

260

240

194

148

132

160

131

Devon and Cornwall

144

158

120

109

116

126

121

Avon and Somerset

181

207

172

182

200

170

164

Gloucestershire

68

51

49

61

66

71

58

Wiltshire

25

32

33

29

33

44

49

Dorset

78

42

48

46

57

67

52

North Wales

74

74

97

98

93

107

116

Gwent

59

70

94

86

91

82

88

South Wales

327

328

291

344

345

328

387

Dyfed-Powys

51

58

42

44

37

33

32

England and Wales

8,196

8,418

7,709

7,138

7,525

7,323

7,313

(1) The sentence shown is the most severe sentence given for the principal offence (i.e. the principal sentence), secondary sentences given for the principal offence and sentences for non-principal offences are not counted in the tables.

(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

(3) Includes the Metropolitan Police and City of London Police Force Areas.


Written Question
Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System Review
Thursday 25th January 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what progress his Department is making on implementation of the recommendations of the Corston Report on women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system, published in March 2017.

Answered by Phillip Lee

The Government accepted 40 out of the 43 recommendations of Baroness Corston’s Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System and progress has been made in part or fully against these.

In recognition of the distinct needs of female offenders, we are developing a female offender strategy to improve outcomes for women in the community and in custody. This will build on the principles set out in Baroness Corston’s report.


Written Question
Reoffenders: Females
Thursday 25th January 2018

Asked by: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on the recidivism rates for female prisoners who have received (a) custodial prison sentences and (b) community supervision orders in each year for which data is available.

Answered by Rory Stewart

We are committed to doing all we can to address the issues around female offending so we can better protect the public and deliver more effective rehabilitation. That is why we plan to set out a strategy for female offenders, to improve outcomes and services for women in both the community and custody

The table below shows the proven reoffending data for adult females released from custody or receiving community orders between January 2011 and December 2015. As it shows, reconviction rates have remained relatively stable across this period.

New Data Source

Jan - Mar 2011

Apr - Jun 2011

Jul - Sep 2011

Oct - Dec 2011

Jan - Mar 2012

Apr - Jun 2012

Jul - Sep 2012

Oct - Dec 2012

Jan - Mar 2013

Apr - Jun 2013

Jul - Sep 2013

Oct - Dec 2013

Jan - Mar 2014

Apr - Jun 2014

Jul - Sep 2014

Oct - Dec 2014

Jan - Mar 2015

Apr - Jun 2015

Jul - Sep 2015

Oct - Dec 2015

Custody

Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)

48.5

49.1

47.6

48.2

48.2

49.2

51.1

49.1

50.5

49.8

50.4

52.4

52.0

52.5

52.2

53.2

53.7

51.2

53.6

53.2

Community Orders1

Proportion of offenders who reoffend (%)

33.5

31.9

33.5

32.8

32.1

31.7

31.5

32.0

33.4

34.2

34.6

34.4

31.9

31.8

31.4

31.9

29.7

30.5

32.0

31.3

Notes

1. Community Orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and came into force from April 2005. "-" indicates that data is not available for January - March 2005.

2. These figures have been derived from administrative IT systems, which as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

3. A proven reoffence is defined as any offence committed in a one year follow-up period that leads to a court conviction, caution, reprimand or warning in the one year follow-up or within a further six month waiting period to allow the offence to be proven in court.

4. Number of offenders in each disposal category do not sum to the total number of offenders. This is due to a difference in methodology to provide a realistic and relevant view of proven reoffending by disposal type. The first event within each disposal is taken as the start point. Therefore, some offenders will appear in more than one disposal category.

5. From October 2015 onwards, reoffending data are collected using different data sources to previous quarters. January to March 2005 is the earliest quarter for which proven reoffending data exists, however the quarters before October 2015 are not directly comparable to those after.