To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Teachers: Recruitment
Thursday 25th April 2024

Asked by: Matt Western (Labour - Warwick and Leamington)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of trends in the level of funding for subject knowledge enhancement programmes for (a) primary maths, (b) design and technology, (c) English, (d) biology and (e) religious education on the future recruitment of student teachers in those subjects.

Answered by Damian Hinds - Minister of State (Education)

The department reviews all policies, including subject knowledge enhancement (SKE) courses, on a regular basis to adapt its approach to attracting new teachers where needed and to ensure that interventions are focused where they will have the most positive impact for children and young people.

When reviewing the SKE package for the remainder of the 2023/24 academic year, factors including teacher supply needs, the volume of SKE participants associated with each subject and the relative recruitment to Initial Teacher Training (ITT) were all taken into account to ensure that the department is targeting funding where it is needed most.

The department remains committed to recruiting the teachers it needs. The ITT financial incentives package for the 2024/25 recruitment cycle is worth up to £196 million, which is a £15 million increase on the last cycle. Tax free ITT bursaries continue to be available in design and technology, English, biology and religious education for ITT 2024. The department will continue to review the SKE programme on a regular basis to ensure that its funding is targeted as effectively as possible.


Division Vote (Commons)
24 Apr 2024 - Renters (Reform) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Western (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 143
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Apr 2024 - Renters (Reform) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Western (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 144
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Apr 2024 - Renters (Reform) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Western (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 282
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Apr 2024 - Regulatory Reform - View Vote Context
Matt Western (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 50
Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 24 Apr 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Matt Western (Lab - Warwick and Leamington) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Roads: Warickshire
Tuesday 23rd April 2024

Asked by: Matt Western (Labour - Warwick and Leamington)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the impact of potholes on drivers in Warwickshire.

Answered by Guy Opperman - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Secretary of State is keen to support motorists in Warwickshire, and elsewhere, by mitigating the impact of potholes. Under the 1980 Highways Act, local highway authorities, such as Warwickshire County Council, are responsible for maintaining and managing the local highway network within their area.

For the 2024/25 financial year, the Government is providing Warwickshire County Council with over £18.2 million for highway maintenance. This includes £2.056 million of reallocated HS2 funding and is a 12.7% increase over the funding the Council was expecting in 2024/25 before the Prime Minister’s Network North announcement.

It is up to the respective highway authority how best to spend this funding to fulfil their statutory duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. Funding is not ring fenced and Warwickshire can spend the money on all aspects of highway maintenance such as bridges, cycleways, and lighting columns – and not just the fixing of potholes.


Written Question
Roads: Repairs and Maintenance
Tuesday 23rd April 2024

Asked by: Matt Western (Labour - Warwick and Leamington)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether he has made an estimate of the number of pothole-related damages to vehicles in Warwickshire in each year since 2010.

Answered by Guy Opperman - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Under the 1980 Highways Act, local highway authorities, such as Warwickshire County Council, are responsible for maintaining and managing the local highway network within their area.

For the 2024/25 financial year, the Government is providing Warwickshire County Council with over £18.2 million for highway maintenance. This includes £2.056 million of reallocated HS2 funding and is a 12.7% increase over the funding the Council was expecting in 2024/25 before the Prime Minister’s Network North announcement.

It is up to the respective highway authority how best to spend this funding to fulfil their statutory duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. Funding is not ring fenced and Warwickshire can spend the money on all aspects of highway maintenance such as bridges, cycleways, and lighting columns – and not just the fixing of potholes.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 22 Apr 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Matt Western (Lab - Warwick and Leamington) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Western (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 172 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 237