To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Lords Chamber - Fri 12 Sep 2025
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

"My Lords, I apologise for giving you three very personal examples. When I was in my late twenties, we had a baby son who died, and I almost died giving birth to him. For a few short hours, while our lives held in the balance, it looked as if choices …..."
Baroness Prentis of Banbury - View Speech

View all Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Written Question
Faith Schools: Choirs
Tuesday 12th August 2025

Asked by: Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have held any meetings with the Church of England or the Roman Catholic Church regarding the protection of cathedral schools and their choral traditions.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

Ministers and departmental officials hold regular meetings with both the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church. The most recent meetings with my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education took place earlier this month. There have been no issues or concerns raised about the protection of Cathedral Schools and their choral traditions.


Written Question
Churches: Choirs
Tuesday 29th July 2025

Asked by: Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are considering adding the church choral tradition to the list of inventories under the UN Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Communities of practice will be able to submit their living heritage to the inventories when we open for submissions later this year. We would welcome a submission on church choral tradition.


Written Question
Local Government: Investment
Thursday 24th July 2025

Asked by: Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Community Municipal Investment (CMI) green investment bonds, such as those offered by the London Boroughs of Greenwich, Southwark, Hounslow and Hammersmith and Fulham, are authorised by any regulator; and whether retail investors in such municipal bonds have any form of protection under the (1) Financial Services Ombudsman Scheme or (2) Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 establishes a framework whereby any person, whether an individual or firm, can only carry out a regulated activity by way of business if they are authorised by the appropriate regulator or are exempt from the authorisation requirement. Under this framework, the government determines which activities are regulated activities, by specifying them in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (RAO).

Where local authorities are the issuers of bonds, or borrowers under loans, they themselves would not require authorisation from a financial services regulator to act in that capacity, and would not be subject to regulation by the financial services regulators.

Financial services firms facilitating access to such funding by local authorities may, depending on the circumstances, be subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority, and investors may be eligible to refer disputes with the regulated firm to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Depending on the precise circumstances of any products offered, compensation in the case of default may be available under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.


Division Vote (Lords)
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 41 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143
Division Vote (Lords)
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123