To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
FirstPort: Standards
Friday 17th April 2026

Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 1 December 2025 to Question 94116 on FirstPort: Standards, what discussions he has had with FirstPort since 17 November 2025.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Neither the Secretary of State nor I have regular discussions with individual property management companies regarding effective communications with leaseholders.

I have had no further direct discussions with FirstPort subsequent to my meeting with Martin King on 17 November 2025 and the exchange of letters that followed it as referenced in my answer to Question UIN 94116 on 1 December 2025.

My Department continues to actively monitor standards and quality of service among property management companies, including FirstPort.

I otherwise refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 85213 on 4 November 2025.


Written Question
Property Management Companies: Leasehold
Friday 17th April 2026

Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he is having discussions with property management companies on effective communications with leaseholders.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Neither the Secretary of State nor I have regular discussions with individual property management companies regarding effective communications with leaseholders.

I have had no further direct discussions with FirstPort subsequent to my meeting with Martin King on 17 November 2025 and the exchange of letters that followed it as referenced in my answer to Question UIN 94116 on 1 December 2025.

My Department continues to actively monitor standards and quality of service among property management companies, including FirstPort.

I otherwise refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 85213 on 4 November 2025.


Written Question
Nutrition: Research
Thursday 16th April 2026

Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the need to introduce transparency requirements for the funding of nutrition research.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Department funds research on health and social care through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR welcomes funding applications for research into any aspect of human health, including nutrition.

The Department is committed to funding research that has robust ethical oversight and independent governance. The NIHR ensures this by requiring studies, where appropriate, to gain approval from the Health Research Authority, which is responsible for overseeing ethical, governance, and legal aspects of research in England. Studies must also comply with the UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research, which outlines the principles of good practice in the management and conduct of health and social care research in the United Kingdom.


Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70