To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Trade Agreements: Dispute Resolution
Monday 21st September 2020

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what assessment she has made of the effect of Investor-state dispute settlement cases during the covid-19 pandemic; and is she will take steps to restrict the use of such clauses in relation to matters concerning the Government’s response to the covid-19 pandemic.

Answered by Ranil Jayawardena

HM Government recognises the importance of strengthening international investment in response to COVID-19, and the important role played by both investment protection and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in safeguarding British investors overseas, including pensioners across the country through their pension funds and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

We are clear that HM Government and our treaty partners retain the right to regulate in the public interest, including for public health purposes, and this is already recognised under international law. There has never been a successful ISDS claim against the United Kingdom, nor has the threat of potential claims affected our legislation.


Written Question
Riot Control Weapons: Chile
Tuesday 7th July 2020

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what steps she has taken to prevent the export of UK-manufactured crowd-control (a) equipment and (b) arms being used for internal repression in Chile.

Answered by Ranil Jayawardena

I have been sorry to see the unrest on the streets of Santiago. Arms and certain crowd control equipment require an export licence. I can assure that Hon. Gentleman that all export licence applications are assessed on a case-by-case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria (the ‘Consolidated Criteria’).

In reaching a decision, the Department for International Trade (DIT) receives advice from a number of Departments including the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). Together, we draw on all available information, including reports from Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) and our diplomatic missions. The Consolidated Criteria provides a thorough risk assessment framework and requires us to think hard about the impact of exporting any items.

Assessments under Criterion 2 in particular, include the respect of rights and freedoms in the country of final destination. A licence will not be issued if to do so would be inconsistent with the Consolidated Criteria, including where there is a clear risk that the proposed export might be used for internal repression.

We continue to global monitor developments closely and are able to review licences – and suspend or revoke as necessary – when circumstances require, in line with the Consolidated Criteria.


Written Question
Riot Control Weapons: USA
Wednesday 17th June 2020

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what the current status is of export licenses to the US for anti-riot gear.

Answered by Ranil Jayawardena

My Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade and I have been sorry to see the violence that has taken place in the United States of America.

All export licence applications are assessed on a case-by-case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria (‘Consolidated Criteria’). In reaching a decision, the Department for International Trade receives advice from a number of Departments including the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Together, we draw on all available information, including reports from NGOs and our diplomatic missions. The Consolidated Criteria provides a thorough risk assessment framework and requires us to think hard about the impact of exporting any equipment. These are not decisions my Department takes lightly, and we will not license the export of items where to do so would be inconsistent with the Consolidated Criteria.

Any licence granted by my Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade may be subject to conditions. In addition, in line with the Consolidated Criteria, my Department is able to review licences – and suspend or revoke as necessary – when circumstances require. There are currently eight extant licences that may be linked to law enforcement agencies. Six are Open Individual Export Licences (‘OIELs’), which have potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. Two are Standard Individual Export Licences (‘SIELs’), which have numerous potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. There are also 15 Open General Licences (‘OGLs’) for which businesses can register that cover the export of anti-riot gear.

Much information is in the public domain already. We publish information on all export licences issued, refused and revoked on a quarterly and annual basis as official statistics on GOV.UK – at: gov.uk/government/collections/strategic-export-controls-licensing-data – and whilst data on actual exports is not required to be centrally held, the licences issued until the end of December 2019 are available.


Written Question
Riot Control Weapons: USA
Wednesday 17th June 2020

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, if she will revoke existing licences to export riot gear to the US.

Answered by Ranil Jayawardena

My Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade and I have been sorry to see the violence that has taken place in the United States of America.

All export licence applications are assessed on a case-by-case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria (‘Consolidated Criteria’). In reaching a decision, the Department for International Trade receives advice from a number of Departments including the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Together, we draw on all available information, including reports from NGOs and our diplomatic missions. The Consolidated Criteria provides a thorough risk assessment framework and requires us to think hard about the impact of exporting any equipment. These are not decisions my Department takes lightly, and we will not license the export of items where to do so would be inconsistent with the Consolidated Criteria.

Any licence granted by my Rt Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Trade may be subject to conditions. In addition, in line with the Consolidated Criteria, my Department is able to review licences – and suspend or revoke as necessary – when circumstances require. There are currently eight extant licences that may be linked to law enforcement agencies. Six are Open Individual Export Licences (‘OIELs’), which have potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. Two are Standard Individual Export Licences (‘SIELs’), which have numerous potential end users that include law enforcement agencies. There are also 15 Open General Licences (‘OGLs’) for which businesses can register that cover the export of anti-riot gear.

Much information is in the public domain already. We publish information on all export licences issued, refused and revoked on a quarterly and annual basis as official statistics on GOV.UK – at: gov.uk/government/collections/strategic-export-controls-licensing-data – and whilst data on actual exports is not required to be centrally held, the licences issued until the end of December 2019 are available.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 22 May 2019
International Education Strategy

"One of the flagship programmes for our student exchange is the Erasmus programme. Non-EU countries can take part in that, but they must accept freedom of movement. Does my hon. Friend agree that it would be hugely detrimental for the UK to leave the Erasmus programme and that the Government …..."
Alex Sobel - View Speech

View all Alex Sobel (LAB - Leeds Central and Headingley) contributions to the debate on: International Education Strategy

Written Question
Sodium Thiopental: USA
Thursday 28th March 2019

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, whether the UK ban on exports of sodium thiopental to the US will be maintained after the UK leaves the EU.

Answered by Graham Stuart

If the UK leaves without a deal, Sodium Thiopental will be controlled by the proposed regulation retaining the relevant EU regulation, (EU) 2019/125, under the EU (Withdrawal) Act. This will be subject to both houses agreeing to the proposed retaining regulation.


Written Question
Trade Agreements: NHS
Friday 15th March 2019

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, if he will make it his Department's policy to exclude health services from all future trade agreements.

Answered by George Hollingbery

I refer the Honourable Friend for Leeds North West to the answer I gave to the Member for Midlothian on 26 February 2019, UIN 224362.


Written Question
Arms Trade: Indonesia
Monday 16th July 2018

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, pursuant to the Answer of 123992 to Question 123992 on Indonesia: Arms Trade, whether the arms granted in the licenses to Indonesia where used in the Indonesian provinces of (a) Papua or (b) West Papua.

Answered by Graham Stuart

All decisions to approve export licences to Indonesia are considered on a case-by-case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria (Consolidated Criteria). Decisions are based on the most up-to-date information and analysis available, including reports from our overseas network.

We have no information to suggest that UK supplied equipment to Indonesia has been used in a way which is inconsistent with the Consolidated Criteria. We do not routinely monitor where, within a jurisdiction, goods are used after a licence has been granted. However, we will revoke any licences that we assess to be no longer consistent with the Consolidated Criteria, for example because of changed circumstances in the export destination.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 03 Jul 2018
UK-Israel Trade

"On that point, is not one of the issues with the agreement, as pointed out to us earlier by the European Council on Foreign Relations, the fact that Israel defines the borders? We have the issues of the green line, the blue line, the purple line and the status of …..."
Alex Sobel - View Speech

View all Alex Sobel (LAB - Leeds Central and Headingley) contributions to the debate on: UK-Israel Trade

Written Question
Arms Trade: Israel
Wednesday 18th April 2018

Asked by: Alex Sobel (Labour (Co-op) - Leeds Central and Headingley)

Question to the Department for International Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, how many UK arms export licenses have been granted to Israel in each of the last five years.

Answered by Graham Stuart

The following numbers of licences to Israel have been granted for military rated goods for each of the last five years:

2013 - 180 licences

2014 - 150 licences

2015 - 181 licences

2016 - 192 licences

2017 - 169 licences