Foreign Financial Influence and Interference: UK Politics

Debate between Alex Sobel and Steve Reed
Wednesday 25th March 2026

(1 week, 3 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Steve Reed Portrait Steve Reed
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not so sure there is much precedent for that level of retrospectivity.

Alex Sobel Portrait Alex Sobel (Leeds Central and Headingley) (Lab/Co-op)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank Philip Rycroft for meeting me in my position as chair of the fair elections APPG and for including some of my points and evidence in this excellent review. I also thank the Secretary of State for including the donations cap—an issue that I raised with the Minister for Democracy, my hon. Friend the Member for Chester North and Neston (Samantha Dixon), when we met.

My question relates to page 45 of the review, which talks about international best practice, and the point I raised with Philip Rycroft about VIGINUM in France, which monitors foreign online interference. That is the most pressing issue in UK politics today. It is about not just identifying it and publishing it, but attributing and exposing it, and in some cases even getting it removed. Are we considering the same modalities, capabilities and powers when implementing that recommendation in the UK?

Steve Reed Portrait Steve Reed
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

We will respond in detail to each of the 17 recommendations, including the one that my hon. Friend references. However, he is absolutely right: we can and should learn from best practice in other democracies to make our democracy as robust and safe as it can be.

Electoral Resilience

Debate between Alex Sobel and Steve Reed
Tuesday 16th December 2025

(3 months, 2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Steve Reed Portrait Steve Reed
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Safeguards are already in place, but the fact that the review will report in March means that it will come ahead of the elections. That is because not only Members of this House, but voters across the country, will want to know that the safeguards against malign foreign financial interference in the coming elections are sufficiently robust to ensure that those elections are free and fair.

Alex Sobel Portrait Alex Sobel (Leeds Central and Headingley) (Lab/Co-op)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

As the chair of the all-party parliamentary group for fair elections, I warmly welcome this independent review into foreign financial interference in UK politics. However, foreign financial interference is not the only threat to our electoral resilience: misinformation, disinformation and aspects of the electoral system itself are all flaws in the system. Will those issues be in scope for the elections and democracy Bill that is coming next year?

Steve Reed Portrait Steve Reed
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The terms of reference will be laid in the House of Commons Library today, but the review is not the only way in which we are looking at the security and integrity of our elections. The Minister for Security is leading the defending democracy taskforce, which is looking more widely at action that we may need to take to ensure that our safeguards remain robust against the changing nature of the threat to our democracy.