Property Taxes Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Property Taxes

Andrew Pakes Excerpts
Wednesday 3rd September 2025

(3 days, 6 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Pakes Portrait Andrew Pakes (Peterborough) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Mel Stride Portrait Sir Mel Stride
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If I am an hon. Friend, I will certainly give way.

Andrew Pakes Portrait Andrew Pakes
- Hansard - -

I am sure Hansard will correct me.

The right hon. Gentleman just made some comments about high net worth or high value individuals. In my constituency, I am particularly interested in individuals on low incomes. In Peterborough, I represent a city with one of the highest levels of those employed on zero-hours contracts and in chronically insecure work. Does he not agree that his party often wants all the spending, but none of the funding for delivery? He talked about reducing taxation for some of those with higher net worth, but will he also talk about which doctors’ surgeries in my constituency would suffer cuts under his plans, which individuals would receive no protection for their employment rights, and how the people of Peterborough would be worse off because he wants to reduce the spending that will fix the foundations of this country?

Mel Stride Portrait Sir Mel Stride
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman refers to cutting spending. His party attempted to cut spending, but entirely failed to do so. My point is that if he wants money to spend on public services, he needs to cut welfare and should worry about how to do so. I do not know how he voted when that was put to the test in this House, but if he in any way voted against his own Government and against getting on top of the welfare bill, he should ask his own question of himself.

As for those on low incomes, they are precisely the people who are now being devastated by the increase in national insurance. There is not just an increase in the rate, but a substantial reduction in the threshold at which national insurance kicks in, which has meant higher unemployment, in particular among younger workers, part-time workers, women and people getting that vital first job so that they can get themselves on a career path. They are the people whom the Labour Government are punishing most.