Oral Answers to Questions

Andrew Rosindell Excerpts
Thursday 1st December 2016

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Jones Portrait Mr Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady is entirely right: it is necessary to consult businesses, universities, civic leaders and all parts of civil society. Indeed, that is precisely what we are doing. The Department is engaging with representatives of over 50 sectors across the economy. This is important work, and it is much better to get a proper, reasonable Brexit than the hasty sort of Brexit that she and her colleagues seem to be advocating.

Andrew Rosindell Portrait Andrew Rosindell (Romford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

2. What assessment his Department has made of the likelihood of the UK having to contribute to the EU budget after the UK has left the EU.

David Davis Portrait The Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Mr David Davis)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Withdrawing from the EU means decisions on how we spend taxpayers’ money will be made in the United Kingdom. We will strike a deal in the best interests of United Kingdom taxpayers. It is the job of my Department to bring back control over issues such as money, law and borders. As we do so, it will be up to this House and this Government to make the decisions.

Andrew Rosindell Portrait Andrew Rosindell
- Hansard - -

I do not expect the Secretary of State to reveal his negotiating position today, but will he accept that on 23 June the British people voted to restore control over the money that we have paid to the European Union? They want that money spent in the United Kingdom, not subsidising Brussels.

David Davis Portrait Mr Davis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand entirely where my hon. Friend is coming from. Indeed, as he well knows, I have a great deal of sympathy with that viewpoint. Of course we intend to respect the decision of the British people and what underpins it. As he rightly says, it would be irresponsible to set out red lines or to make unilateral decisions at this stage, but it must be made clear that we want decisions over how taxpayers’ money is spent to be made in this House.