House of Lords: Remote Proceedings Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb

Main Page: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party - Life peer)

House of Lords: Remote Proceedings

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb Excerpts
Tuesday 21st April 2020

(4 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Supplementary question: the noble Lord, Lord Newby.

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb Portrait Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (GP)
- Hansard - -

I think that I was next on the list.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

You are right; I beg your pardon. I do apologise for cutting you out.

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb Portrait Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Lord Speaker. That is one aspect of the question that I was about to ask. I want to emphasise the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, that remote voting is already done in other places. Given the advances into virtual sittings that we have made in the past two weeks, I think that remote voting has to come to ensure that there is a democratic aspect to the legislation that we pass.

There is a formula for the allocation of Questions and supplementary questions. I am sure that your Lordships know that the two Greens in the House are very enthusiastic participants in almost its every aspect. I would hate to think that we were excluded because of some weird allocation of Questions. Is that something the committee can look into?

Lord McFall of Alcluith Portrait The Senior Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, the House of Commons authorities are developing the functionality for remote voting, but use of it would need to be approved by that House. The House of Lords could develop a similar platform if it desired, but due to the demands on the Parliamentary Digital Service, this would be at the expense of other work. Because of the differences in the technical platforms used by each House, such functionality would take a number of weeks to develop. I am open to the noble Baroness and others keeping in touch with me on this issue.

On the second point raised by the noble Baroness, I am aware from my conversations with her in the past that she wishes for Greens and non-affiliated Members to get their fair share of Questions and other business in this Chamber. I will ensure that they get that. There is not much in the guidance at the moment, but as a first step, I will bring her point to the Procedure Committee.