Farmers and Landowners: Tax Consequences Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury
Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I said, the tax rules should not have a bearing on many environmental activities under the ELM schemes. We are cognisant, particularly where there may be a change of land use, that this could invoke questions of tax treatments—although, even if the land may not be used for agriculture any more, it may often still qualify for business property relief, for example, as an alternative inheritance tax relief.

Baroness Meacher Portrait Baroness Meacher (CB)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, following up the question from the Labour Front Bench, could the Minister indicate the timing? When will the Government be able to clarify these issues in relation to the many parts the Minister referred to?

Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I understand it—I am working hard to make sure that I fully understand the tax implications of these schemes, but I am not yet as well versed in these things as my noble friend Lord Benyon—we are still designing the landscape recovery scheme and piloting different approaches. Those schemes are not expected to be rolled out in full until 2024, so that work is ongoing. On other schemes that are already in place, we do not expect the larger-scale schemes for farmers, such as the sustainable farming initiative, to have significant tax implications for farmers.