Shawcross Report: Compensation for Victims Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Rawlings
Main Page: Baroness Rawlings (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Rawlings's debates with the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
(4 years, 8 months ago)
Lords Chamber
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, the noble Baroness rightly raises the issue of the US, French and German Governments’ claims for atrocities. She will also note that these were direct atrocities—including, from a UK perspective, the killing of WPC Fletcher, as well as the victims of Lockerbie—and they have been compensated. By contrast, Libya was defined as a third party in IRA terrorism. I understand what the noble Baroness says, including about the importance of a UN review of the regime within the context of UN Security Council resolutions, but I assure her, as I have other noble Lords, that we are continuing to look at victims. An important and sensitive report has been produced internally and we are looking at all matters before responding appropriately. I cannot give the noble Baroness more detail than that at this time.
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Rawlings (Con) [V] 
        
    
        
    
        I understand why the victims finally deserve an answer, but can I ask the Minister to encourage the publication of William Shawcross’s conclusions and recommendations, rather than publishing the whole—obviously sensitive—report?
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        As I have said before, I note what my noble friend said; it is a practical suggestion and I will certainly take that back.