Debates between Catherine West and Ellie Reeves during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Wed 11th Oct 2017
Finance Bill
Commons Chamber

Committee: 1st sitting: House of Commons

Finance Bill

Debate between Catherine West and Ellie Reeves
Ellie Reeves Portrait Ellie Reeves
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is not about big corporates; I am talking about adequately compensating people who have been sacked or discriminated against at work. In my experience, a sacked worker’s priority is to receive a fair settlement, not to avoid tax. It seems to me to be another example of the Government hounding people when they are at their most vulnerable, when instead they should be helping and supporting them.

The introduction of measures that will allow the Government to reduce the £30,000 tax-free threshold via the backdoor of delegated legislation could lead to profound effects on people’s lives without there being any proper scrutiny in Parliament. That is even more important given the fact that the threshold has not been increased since 1988; had it risen in line with prices, it would be £71,000 today. Amendment 2 would mean the threshold could only be increased, not decreased.

Catherine West Portrait Catherine West
- Hansard - -

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is curious that, between 2010 and 2014, such a large company as Thames Water paid zero corporation tax, yet here we are talking about sums of £30,000? It is estimated that there is £6 trillion in tax havens, yet we are quibbling the amounts that go to individuals who have had a difficult time in the workplace.

Ellie Reeves Portrait Ellie Reeves
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I absolutely agree. The clause will penalise people who have lost their jobs and people who have been discriminated against—