Debates between Chris Heaton-Harris and James Sunderland during the 2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Chris Heaton-Harris and James Sunderland
Wednesday 9th November 2022

(1 year, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chris Heaton-Harris Portrait Chris Heaton-Harris
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The answer is, basically, yes. The Government understand how important addressing the legacy of the past is for Northern Ireland. We recognise that the Bill is difficult for many, and we continue to engage with stakeholders such as WAVE and across the piece regarding their concerns and how we can address them as the Bill proceeds through Parliament. I hope that the hon. Member recognises, though, that there is no perfect solution to this issue. We are committed to a way forward that deals with Northern Ireland’s troubled past as comprehensively and fairly as we possibly can.

James Sunderland Portrait James Sunderland (Bracknell) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

When might we see the legacy Bill back in this place, and will there be a necessary review of moral equivalence and terminology?

Chris Heaton-Harris Portrait Chris Heaton-Harris
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Government are clear that we will never accept any moral equivalence between those who upheld the law in Northern Ireland and those on all sides who sought to destroy it. The legislation seeks to deliver better outcomes for all those most affected by the troubles. It is important to remember that that includes the families of service personnel, more than 1,000 of whom were killed during the troubles. The Government will continue to engage with those most directly impacted by the legislation about their concerns and how these might be addressed. The Second Reading of the legacy Bill in the House of Lords will take place in a couple of weeks’ time.