Written Question
Friday 6th February 2026
Asked by:
Clive Lewis (Labour - Norwich South)
Question
to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of research by Morgan Stanley for Bloomberg published on 26 January 2026 showing that the UK has experienced 8% net job losses from AI; and whether he plans to re-evaluate the AI Opportunities Action Plan as a result of those findings.
Answered by Kanishka Narayan
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)
The Government notes the Morgan Stanley research. Whilst it is clear that AI will impact the labour market, DSIT’s recently published assessment shows that there is significant uncertainty over the nature and extent of this impact. The new AI and the Future of Work Unit has been established to develop rigorous research and improved data, so that we can monitor these impacts. This will allow us to ensure Government is front footed in developing the right policy response.
The single best way to protect jobs in this country, and to create new ones, is for businesses in the UK to be competitive. AI creates enormous opportunities for British businesses to stay ahead of their competitors in other countries. That is why it is so important that the UK both wins the AI adoption race and continues to build a strong domestic AI sector. AI sector jobs are already growing rapidly, increasing by 33% between 2023 and 2024, to a total of 86,000.
Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson
"Obviously, people here want to get to the bottom of this, in terms of the accountability of the Prime Minister and other elements in No. 10, and of course they want to get to the bottom of what Peter Mandelson has done. However, the public understand that this is not …..."Clive Lewis - View Speech
View all Clive Lewis (Lab - Norwich South) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
"We on the Labour Benches at least understand the historical consistency:186 years ago the Tories made economic arguments against stopping children being sent up chimneys, and 186 years later they are making the same arguments, about stopping children being put into poverty. Same old Tories, nearly 200 years later!..."Clive Lewis - View Speech
View all Clive Lewis (Lab - Norwich South) contributions to the debate on: Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Feb 2026
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
"I am listening to the hon. Gentleman. Conservative Members always seem to portray this as an individual moral failing. That is how they see welfare, when actually it is about a collective insurance against economic risk. That is how we see it. You see it as a moral issue; we …..."Clive Lewis - View Speech
View all Clive Lewis (Lab - Norwich South) contributions to the debate on: Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill -
View Vote Context
Clive Lewis (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
358 Labour Aye votes vs
0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
Written Question
Thursday 29th January 2026
Asked by:
Clive Lewis (Labour - Norwich South)
Question
to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to the policy paper entitled A new vision for water: white paper, published on 20 January 2026, how members of the working groups were selected; which (a) people and (b) organisations participated in the working groups; and if she will publish the minutes of the working groups.
Answered by Emma Hardy
- Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
A wide range of stakeholders were consulted on reforms through the Independent Water Commission’s Call for Evidence, which received over 50,000 responses.
While there was not a formal working group for the White Paper, ahead of publication the Government also engaged with stakeholders across the water system, including investors, water companies, consumer groups, regulators and environmental groups.
The Government will continue to work constructively with interested parties on reforms and consult on specific measures as needed.
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment -
View Vote Context
Clive Lewis (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
280 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory -
View Vote Context
Clive Lewis (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
277 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284
Early Day Motion
BBC Charter review
(8 Signatures)
28 Jan 2026
Tabled by:
Clive Lewis (Labour - Norwich South)
That this House notes the Government’s Green Paper on the BBC Royal Charter Review; further notes the changing nature of global politics and technology and the role of the BBC in strengthening our democracy; highlights that unaccountable political interference in how the BBC is run undermines public trust and the …
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill -
View Vote Context
Clive Lewis (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
301 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310