To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 151
Written Question
Physician Assistants
Wednesday 5th November 2025

Asked by: Dan Carden (Labour - Liverpool Walton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 30 October to Question 84069 on Physician Assistants, if his Department will set out a timeline for reviewing existing guidance for employers.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

NHS England is currently considering next steps for supporting the wider National Health Service and relevant stakeholders to implement the recommendations of the Leng Review, starting with those focused on patient safety, as requested by the Government.

We will continue to work closely and collaboratively with partners across the NHS, the clinical professions, and their representative bodies so that patients receive safe, effective, and compassionate care in line with the relevant legal and clinical processes. As part of this, NHS England will be working with NHS Employers over the coming months, supported by colleagues in the regions, to consider what guidance and support can be provided to the system to implement those recommendations related to the employment of physician assistants.

As further information to support implementation of the recommendations is available, it will be published at the following link:

https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/response-to-recommendations-from-the-independent-review-of-physician-associates-and-anaesthesia-associates/

Division Vote (Commons)
4 Nov 2025 - Supporting High Streets - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 321
Division Vote (Commons)
4 Nov 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 403
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 103
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 314
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 328
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 311
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 323
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Oct 2025 - China Spying Case - View Vote Context
Dan Carden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 327