To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Asylum: Children
Monday 20th March 2017

Asked by: David Burrowes (Conservative - Enfield, Southgate)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to table AS 08 Q of the Quarterly Immigration Stastics, October to December 2016, how many applications for asylum made during quarter 4 of 2016 were made by unaccompanied children who arrived in the UK (a) under section 67 of the Immigration Act 2016, (b) through the Dublin III Regulation and (c) by their own initiative.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

The period October to December saw 1,161 asylum claims registered by unaccompanied asylum seeking children. It is not currently possible to provide a breakdown however I have committed to publishing more detailed figures in future data releases.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 14 Mar 2017
Detention of Vulnerable Persons

"I congratulate the hon. Lady on securing a debate on a subject whose time has come again—many of us have been involved in debates on it in times gone by—but may I caution her on something? I welcome her scepticism: she is right to be sceptical, given the evidence that …..."
David Burrowes - View Speech

View all David Burrowes (Con - Enfield, Southgate) contributions to the debate on: Detention of Vulnerable Persons

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 14 Mar 2017
Detention of Vulnerable Persons

"The hon. Lady perhaps understates the costs. What about people whose stay is extended, so their time in detention is longer than legally required? The compensation bill is going up by millions of pounds. That is taxpayers’ money, which is being wasted on illegal, extended detention. Frankly, that is a …..."
David Burrowes - View Speech

View all David Burrowes (Con - Enfield, Southgate) contributions to the debate on: Detention of Vulnerable Persons

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 14 Mar 2017
Detention of Vulnerable Persons

"It is a pleasure to take part in this important debate, which gives the Minister a chance to get a taste of the cross-party concern that was amplified last year in the run-up to the Immigration Bill—now the Immigration Act 2016. Many hon. Members, from all parts of the House, …..."
David Burrowes - View Speech

View all David Burrowes (Con - Enfield, Southgate) contributions to the debate on: Detention of Vulnerable Persons

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 14 Mar 2017
Detention of Vulnerable Persons

"I agree. There are warning signs. We have seen the reports in the media and elsewhere on Yarl’s Wood and the scandals that have taken place. We do not want to be in that position. We want to ensure that the recommendations, which were broadly accepted, mean real results, but …..."
David Burrowes - View Speech

View all David Burrowes (Con - Enfield, Southgate) contributions to the debate on: Detention of Vulnerable Persons

Written Question
Detention Centres
Monday 13th March 2017

Asked by: David Burrowes (Conservative - Enfield, Southgate)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Oral Answer of 6 March 2017, Official Report, column 561 on immigration: indefinite detention, on what date her Department plans to publish its plan for the future of the immigration detention estate.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

The Department’s strategy for the future of the immigration detention estate will be communicated in due course.


Written Question
Detention Centres
Monday 13th March 2017

Asked by: David Burrowes (Conservative - Enfield, Southgate)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to publish her Department's plan for the future of the immigration detention estate.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

The Department’s strategy for the future of the immigration detention estate will be communicated in due course.


Written Question
Immigrants: Detainees
Monday 13th March 2017

Asked by: David Burrowes (Conservative - Enfield, Southgate)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the oral contribution of the hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate of 6 March 2017, Official Report, column 561, when the current system of detention reviews will be replaced by individual removal assessments and reviews.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

Following publication of the Government’s response to Stephen Shaw’s Report into the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons on 14 January 2016, work continues on designing and implementing a more effective case management process to replace the existing method of reviewing detention. Case Progression Plans are intended to act as the single caseworking record for all individuals entering immigration detention. These Plans will replace detention reviews and other documentation currently used by the Detention Gatekeeper when assessing suitability for detention, and will ensure that caseworkers focus on progression towards an individuals’ return.

Wider rollout of Case Progression Plans is planned for later this year, subject to the findings from the evaluation of the pilot phase.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 06 Mar 2017
Oral Answers to Questions

"When will the current system of detention reviews be replaced by the individual removal assessments and reviews, and when will the plan for the future of the immigration and detention estate, promised by the Minister’s predecessor last year, be published?..."
David Burrowes - View Speech

View all David Burrowes (Con - Enfield, Southgate) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Refugees: Children
Monday 27th February 2017

Asked by: David Burrowes (Conservative - Enfield, Southgate)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which local authorities (a) provided and (b) offered places under section 67 of the Immigration Act 2016; and how many places were so provided or offered by each such authority.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

In accordance with the Immigration Act 2016 the Government conducted a comprehensive consultation with local authorities across the UK in order to assess capacity for the care of unaccompanied children. On the 13 May 2016 the then Immigration Minister wrote to all local authorities to provide an update on the launch of the National Transfer Scheme (NTS) and to encourage local authorities to participate in all schemes designed for children. On 7 June 2016 the then Immigration Minister, the Minister for Vulnerable Children and Families and the then Minister with responsibility for Syrian Refugees attended a national launch event in London which was attended by local authorities from across the UK.

This was followed by regional events in Leicester, Exeter, Middlesbrough, Leeds, Huntingdon, Bedford, Birmingham, Manchester, Llandidrod Wells, Edinburgh and two further events in London. These events outlined how unaccompanied children arriving from Europe would be placed into local authority care through the National Transfer Scheme (NTS) for unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) and were attended by representatives from over 400 local authorities.


Following this nationwide programme of events, in September 2016 I wrote again to all local authorities in England, Wales and Scotland asking them to confirm how many unaccompanied asylum seeking children they could accommodate under the NTS. Home Office officials also maintained an ongoing dialogue with individual local authorities and regional Strategic Migration Partnerships.

We asked local authorities to consider carefully whether they have the infrastructure and support networks needed to ensure the appropriate care of these unaccompanied children before participating in the NTS


Local authorities told us they had capacity for an additional 400 UASC until the end of the 2016/17 financial year. This is in addition to the unaccompanied children already in local authority care. We estimate that at least 50 of the family reunion cases will require a local authority placement in circumstances where the reunion does not work out


It is for individual local authorities to decide the number of children they are able to accommodate but we continue to work with those not currently participating in the National Transfer Scheme to support them to do so at the earliest opportunity.