Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill (Eighteenth sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill (Eighteenth sitting)

David Linden Excerpts
Afzal Khan Portrait Afzal Khan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I could not agree more. This is a waste of our time and the public’s money. We could make real progress by taking a cross-party approach to a fundamental part of our democracy, but instead we are left debating procedure.

David Linden Portrait David Linden (Glasgow East) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

As ever, it is a great pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Owen. I found myself coming here on a morning when, although this place is obviously very volatile at the best of times, in the past 24 hours, it has been even more volatile. The hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton is right, and his point was backed up by the hon. Member for Lincoln: this whole exercise is entirely futile. When considering the amount of pressure that will exist in this place over the next 24 hours, few people would conclude that having another general election on the current boundaries before Parliament prorogues in April was unlikely; I think that it is probably very likely. We therefore come back to the central question about the boundaries that we want and what they should reflect. The boundaries of my constituency were put in place when I was 11 years old. I do not think that anyone here believes that constituency boundaries do not need to be looked at again. However, the fundamental question is whether to reduce the number of constituencies from 650 to 600, and I rather suspect that very soon we will be going to the country on the basis of 650.

None Portrait The Chair
- Hansard -

I just remind the Committee that the boundaries of my constituency were set in 1546.