Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Dominic Raab Excerpts
Thursday 16th September 2010

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Secretary of State was asked—
Dominic Raab Portrait Mr Dominic Raab (Esher and Walton) (Con)
- Hansard - -

1. What plans he has for the future of existing tariffs and subsidies in relation to renewable technologies and other sources of clean energy.

Chris Huhne Portrait The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Chris Huhne)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are committed to achieving our 2020 renewable energy target, which is a European Union legislative goal. The coalition programme for government commits us to the establishment of a full feed-in-tariff, with the aim of securing a significant increase in investment in renewables while maintaining a banded renewables obligation and not changing the ground rules for existing investments. We are also strongly committed to action on renewable heat.

Dominic Raab Portrait Mr Raab
- Hansard - -

The last Government’s impact assessment on feed-in tariffs showed that domestic solar power is nine times as expensive as industrial turbines and hydro plants in producing clean energy. That means that poorer families must pay billions in their energy bills to subsidise those who can afford solar panels. How will the Secretary of State eliminate such distortions in the market for clean energy, so that we can sustain public confidence and so that our environmental policy makes wider economic sense?

Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Renewables are currently more expensive than fossil fuels, and, as the hon. Gentleman points out, there is a wide variation in the costs of different sources of energy. One of the things the Department must deal with is the enormous uncertainty about the development of costs in future. For example, the cost of onshore wind generation has fallen, and according to calculations that we obtained recently from our Mott MacDonald study, it is competitive with the cost of nuclear generation. As for photovoltaics—a subject that concerns the hon. Gentleman—it is true that ours is not a very sunny country and that Arizona produces about twice the yield that can be obtained anywhere in the United Kingdom, but the costs are falling by roughly 6% a year. We have to make a judgment about the uncertainties in the long run.