To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 21 May 2019
Wild Animals in Circuses (No. 2) Bill (Second sitting)

"Q How often do they have to be transported?

Carol MacManus: We move once a week, on a Sunday.

Peter Jolly: We move once a week.

Carol MacManus: Then they have two days off, because generally we do not work on Monday and Tuesday, and then they work—if you …..."

Ellie Reeves - View Speech

View all Ellie Reeves (Lab - Lewisham West and East Dulwich) contributions to the debate on: Wild Animals in Circuses (No. 2) Bill (Second sitting)

Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Monday 11th February 2019

Asked by: Ellie Reeves (Labour - Lewisham West and East Dulwich)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent steps he has taken to tackle providers of loan scheme arrangements which have (a) promoted and (b) enabled tax avoidance schemes.

Answered by Mel Stride - Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

This Government is committed to tackling avoidance in all its guises. HMRC has a suite of powers to tackle and challenge those who promote or otherwise enable tax avoidance and HMRC is using its powers to challenge all major promoters of avoidance schemes, including disguised remuneration (DR) avoidance schemes. In recent years, HMRC has been investigating over 100 promoters and others involved in avoidance, including disguised remuneration arrangements. In the last year, HMRC has taken litigation action against 5 scheme promoters for failure to disclose under Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) with others deciding to disclose to avoid litigation. Further cases will be litigated in the year ahead.

HMRC has used its powers under the Promoters of Tax Avoidance Schemes (POTAS) legislation to challenge promoters and made three successful complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority about misleading advertising; two of which relate to disguised remuneration schemes. In addition, the ‘Enablers’ penalty regime, introduced in Finance (No. 2) Act 2017, means anyone who knowingly enables another person to use an abusive tax arrangement that is later defeated by HMRC will face a penalty of 100% of the fees they have earned from that activity. HMRC consider criminal investigation and referrals to prosecuting authorities where appropriate.

Since the announcement of the 2019 loan charge at Budget 2016, HMRC has agreed settlements on disguised remuneration schemes with employers and individuals of over 650 million pounds. Overall, 75% of this amount is expected to come from employers, and only 25% from individuals. If scheme users repay the loan or agree a settlement for the tax that they owe with HMRC, they will not face the charge.

HMRC has also introduced a simplified process for those who choose to settle their use of DR avoidance schemes before the loan charge arises. DR scheme users who currently have an income of less than £50,000 and are no longer engaging in tax avoidance can automatically agree a payment plan of up to five years without the need to give HMRC any information about their income and assets. This arrangement has been extended to 7 years for scheme users who have an income of less than £30,000.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Monday 11th February 2019

Asked by: Ellie Reeves (Labour - Lewisham West and East Dulwich)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he has taken to (a) review all loan charge cases and (b) ensure that individual cases are pursued proportionately to their circumstances.

Answered by Mel Stride - Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

Disguised Remuneration (DR) schemes are contrived arrangements that pay loans in place of ordinary remuneration with the sole purpose of avoiding income tax and National Insurance contributions.

HMRC is working hard to help individuals get out of tax avoidance for good and is encouraging anyone who is concerned about their ability to pay what they owe, to contact them as soon as possible to discuss their position. In November 2017, HMRC set up a dedicated helpline for those wanting to settle their avoidance scheme use, and discuss payment options. HMRC will work with all individuals to reach a manageable and sustainable payment plan wherever possible.

Since the announcement of the 2019 loan charge at Budget 2016, HMRC has agreed settlements on disguised remuneration schemes with employers and individuals of over 650 million pounds. Overall, 75% of this amount is expected to come from employers, and only 25% from individuals. If scheme users repay the loan or agree a settlement for the tax that they owe with HMRC, they will not face the charge.

HMRC has also introduced a simplified process for those who choose to settle their use of DR avoidance schemes before the loan charge arises. DR scheme users who currently have an income of less than £50,000 and are no longer engaging in tax avoidance can automatically agree a payment plan of up to five years without the need to give HMRC any information about their income and assets. This arrangement has been extended to 7 years for scheme users who have an income of less than £30,000.

Those who consider they need more than five (or seven) years to pay what they owe or who earn £50,000 or more should still come forward and talk to HMRC about payment terms. There are no defined minimum or maximum time periods for payment arrangements and HMRC can tailor any payment plan to their individual financial circumstances.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Jul 2018
Oral Answers to Questions

"T2. The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 was intended to save £450 million a year on legal aid, but last year’s spending was more than £950 million down from 2010 levels. As we find ourselves in an access to justice crisis, what discussions have Treasury Ministers …..."
Ellie Reeves - View Speech

View all Ellie Reeves (Lab - Lewisham West and East Dulwich) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Children: Day Care
Tuesday 8th May 2018

Asked by: Ellie Reeves (Labour - Lewisham West and East Dulwich)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 1 May 2018 to Question 138522, how many applications for 30 hours of free childcare have been processed in the last three months for which data is available.

Answered by Elizabeth Truss

In the three months to 1 May 2018 over 62,000 new applications for 30 hours free childcare were processed. This includes applications where the parent was found not to be eligible for 30 hours free childcare.


Written Question
Children: Day Care
Tuesday 1st May 2018

Asked by: Ellie Reeves (Labour - Lewisham West and East Dulwich)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what proportion of applications for 30 hours of free childcare have been processed within seven days in the last three months for which data is available.

Answered by Elizabeth Truss

Between 1 January and 31 March 2018 over 99% of applications through childcare service (through which parents apply for 30 hours free childcare and Tax-Free Childcare) were processed within 5 working days.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 24 Apr 2018
Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [Lords]

"I want to speak to amendments 8 and 9, which, unlike new clause 4, would lead to an outright ban on cold calling by claims management companies.

Claims management companies make and send around 51 million personal injury-related calls and texts each year. Such calls are not only a nuisance; …..."

Ellie Reeves - View Speech

View all Ellie Reeves (Lab - Lewisham West and East Dulwich) contributions to the debate on: Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [Lords]

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 24 Apr 2018
Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [Lords]

"I absolutely agree. Surely a better solution to this issue is to have an outright ban on cold calling in personal injury claims by claims management companies, which is exactly what amendments 8 and 9 would do.

New clause 4 gives the single financial guidance body the ability to advise …..."

Ellie Reeves - View Speech

View all Ellie Reeves (Lab - Lewisham West and East Dulwich) contributions to the debate on: Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [Lords]

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 17 Apr 2018
Oral Answers to Questions

"T8. The housing crisis has gone on for far too long under this Government. Lewisham’s Labour council is about to build its 500th new council home since 2015, but many people still come to my surgeries because they reside in temporary accommodation. Will the Chancellor now commit to reversing the …..."
Ellie Reeves - View Speech

View all Ellie Reeves (Lab - Lewisham West and East Dulwich) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 27 Feb 2018
Oral Answers to Questions

"T7. Members have already raised the insufficient funding of local authorities by this Government. A recent campaign in Lewisham prevented local children’s and adolescents’ mental health services from being cut, but they are still facing a 5% loss in funding from national Government. When will the Government finally take this …..."
Ellie Reeves - View Speech

View all Ellie Reeves (Lab - Lewisham West and East Dulwich) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions