To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Sports: Greater Manchester
Tuesday 4th November 2025

Asked by: Elsie Blundell (Labour - Heywood and Middleton North)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether his Department is taking steps to ensure section 106 funding is being used by councils in Greater Manchester to increase revenue for sports facilities.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The National Planning Policy Framework makes clear that access to high-quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and physical activity is important for the health and well-being of communities. The Framework sets out that planning policies should be based on robust and up-to-date assessments of the need for open space, sport and recreation facilities and opportunities for new provision, which plans should then seek to accommodate.

Local planning authorities can use planning obligations, entered into under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended), to help mitigate the impact of a specific development to make it acceptable in planning terms. This could include, for example, requiring a developer to contribute towards the provision of public infrastructure such as sports facilities where this is necessary to make an otherwise unacceptable development acceptable. This will depend on the specifics of the development and is a matter for local decision makers.

The government is clear that developers must deliver on their planning obligations. Section 106 planning obligations are legal agreements, and a local planning authority may take enforcement action in respect of any breach of the obligations contained within them. Enforcement is at the discretion of the local planning authority, and therefore it is for the local planning authority to decide whether enforcement action is appropriate in each case.

The government is committed to strengthening the existing system of developer contributions to ensure new developments provide necessary affordable homes and infrastructure. Further details will be set out in due course.


Written Question
Veterans: Greater Manchester
Tuesday 4th November 2025

Asked by: Elsie Blundell (Labour - Heywood and Middleton North)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he is taking to support veterans into suitable employment in Greater Manchester.

Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence)

Employment support from the Ministry of Defence is available to veterans in Greater Manchester, including the Career Transition Partnership, which can be accessed two years before and two years after leaving Service. In the last year, 88% using this service secured employment within six months. Op ASCEND, available two years after leaving, has helped support over 5,000 veterans and family members into sustainable careers.


Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 314
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 328
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 103
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 311
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 323
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 11
Division Vote (Commons)
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 3