High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill (Carry-over) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill (Carry-over)

Esther McVey Excerpts
Esther McVey Portrait Esther McVey (Tatton) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I rise to oppose the carry-over motion. This is a highly contentious Bill, particularly for my constituents in Tatton. While I know that you would not allow me to get into why I oppose the Bill, Mr Deputy Speaker, there are reasons why it should not be carried over, and I need to put them on the record.

Much has changed since the Bill’s genesis, and two things in particular. First, rail travel between cities has not returned to pre-covid levels or even close. That indicates even to those who agreed with the project in the first place that this expensive white elephant is no longer needed. Secondly, the cost of HS2 had continued to rise at an eye-watering rate, and that was before we saw the current huge rates of inflation, which will put it up further. Those are vital areas of contention where there has been a material change since the Bill started its passage, so it is vital that the House of Commons starts the process of the Bill afresh to see whether the project still commands its support.

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you. Does the Minister wish to respond to those bits that related to the carry-over?