Comprehensive Spending Review Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Comprehensive Spending Review

Gavin Williamson Excerpts
Wednesday 20th October 2010

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman, who is a member of the Treasury Committee, knows that the budget deficit was threatening the economic stability of the country. He also knows that his party proposed to eliminate the structural deficit over a slightly longer period than we propose. That, however, would not have reduced the scale of the cuts; it would merely have prolonged them. A structural deficit is a deficit that does not return when the economy grows. That is the definition of a structural deficit.

We are investing in road projects, and in housing projects: we are providing 150,000 new homes. The hon. Gentleman probably has not had time to study the document, but the capital cuts that have been set out today are less than the capital cuts in the March Budget presented by the Labour party.

Gavin Williamson Portrait Gavin Williamson (South Staffordshire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will my right hon. Friend assure the House that, unlike the Labour party, which abandoned Prudence after two years of government and pursued the policies of economic recklessness, he will continue to hold Prudence close to his heart to ensure that we have long-term stability and growth?

George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can assure my hon. Friend that I am planning a long-term relationship with Prudence.