All 2 Debates between Gordon Birtwistle and Ian Lavery

Zero-hours Contracts

Debate between Gordon Birtwistle and Ian Lavery
Wednesday 16th October 2013

(10 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Ian Lavery Portrait Ian Lavery
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman give the figures for how many people are on zero-hours contracts in Burnley?

Gordon Birtwistle Portrait Gordon Birtwistle
- Hansard - -

I do not have those figures. I only know that I have spoken to a lot of people who were on zero-hours contracts, were happy to be so rather than not working, and have now transferred to permanent contracts that are part-time or even full-time. The figures for Burnley show how successful they have been. That has been a boost for the town and for the people who work there.

I accept that, as the Secretary of State says, there are problems that need to be resolved. Those problems have always been with us; they have not started in the past three years. The Secretary of State is facing the issue head on, unlike Labour Members, who for 13 years did absolutely zero about it. In fact, their zero attention to zero hours was quite marked. He is asking for a full report and will come back to this House in a few months to give us his conclusions.

I hope that the problems are resolved and that zero-hours contracts continue. I would not like them to end, because that would take away the choice that working people have. They can work zero-hours, part-time or full-time, and it is really important that they have that choice. However, there are problems with companies taking advantage of these contracts, and we need to sort that out. I am delighted that the Secretary of State has taken that on and look forward to seeing his conclusions in the near future.

Blacklisting

Debate between Gordon Birtwistle and Ian Lavery
Wednesday 23rd January 2013

(11 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Gordon Birtwistle Portrait Gordon Birtwistle
- Hansard - -

I am happy with that intervention, which basically confirms what I have just said. If the law at the moment is not suitable, it needs to be changed. If there is proof of blacklisting from 2010 onwards when the law was introduced, an investigation should be initiated. If we find that the law is still being contravened and is not suitable to resolve the problem, that law needs to be looked at. I think the Secretary of State implied that in his contribution.

I come from the engineering industry, which is equally as dangerous as the construction industry, although I think engineering receives far more visits from the Health and Safety Executive than the construction and mining industries. Perhaps we could get some information from the Health and Safety Executive on why it feels that blacklisting is creating a lot of health and safety issues.

Ian Lavery Portrait Ian Lavery (Wansbeck) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman elaborate ever so slightly on how he believes the Health and Safety Executive could confirm whether blacklisting is taking place in any industry?