To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Public Transport
Monday 7th April 2014

Asked by: Gordon Marsden (Labour - Blackpool South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether the performance of the Pensions Regulator is assessed in relation to trends in (a) take-up of workplace pensions and (b) anticipated retirement income from current workplace pension accounts.

Answered by Steve Webb

The Pensions Regulator pursues five main objectives as set out in section 5 of the Pensions Act 2004. These objectives include the protection of benefits to the members of work-based pensions schemes. The Pensions Regulator's key performance indicators are designed to operate in support of its statutory objectives.


Written Question
Social Security Benefits: Children
Monday 7th April 2014

Asked by: Gordon Marsden (Labour - Blackpool South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the rationale was for the provisions in the Pensions Bill which allow employers to differentiate pension conditions between previous public sector employees now working in privatised companies and protected persons.

Answered by Steve Webb

The Pensions Bill creates a statutory override designed to allow employers, to a very limited extent, to make changes to the scheme to recover the increased cost of National Insurance that follows from the introduction of the single tier pension.

Protected persons are a small group of individuals (approximately 60,000) employed in some formerly nationalised industries, namely rail, including Transport for London, electricity, coal, nuclear waste and decommissioning, where the employers are limited in their ability to change scheme rules by legislation made at the time of privatisation. This legislation prevents employers from making changes to the pension benefits offered to those employees who were previously employed by the State. The Pensions Bill reaffirms that restriction.

This is a very different situation to other privatisations where a trust deed, rules or other undertaking was made at the time of privatisation, which was not endorsed by Parliament in the same way.

The important distinction we have made is that where duties to restrict changes to the future pension rights of specific workers, in specific industries have been enshrined in law and endorsed by Parliament, the statutory override should not allow employers to disregard that legislation.

It should also be noted that contractual agreements between public sector organisations and third parties, which may provide pension protection for staff now working in private companies, are not affected by the statutory override


Written Question
Schools: Playing Fields
Monday 7th April 2014

Asked by: Gordon Marsden (Labour - Blackpool South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of whether an individual on the minimum wage for a full working lifetime will receive a higher retirement income under the new single tier pension system than under the existing pension system.

Answered by Steve Webb

It is not possible to answer this question, as in order to calculate how much state pension an individual may receive in retirement under the single-tier system, compared to the current system, it is necessary to make a considerable number of assumptions. For instance: when they reach State Pension age, whether they have been contracted-out of the Additional Pension, or how many years they live after retirement.

Chapter 3 of the Single Tier Impact Assessment provides a detailed commentary on factors that are likely to influence whether someone is a notional gainer or loser compared to the current system.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/254151/a-pensions-bill-single-tier-ia-oct-2013.pdf


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 24 Mar 2014
Inherited Social Housing Tenancies

"Has the Minister made any assessment of how much time local authorities, such as my own in Blackpool, will have to spend clearing up this mess, which the right hon. Member for Banbury (Sir Tony Baldry) charitably referred to as “her lacuna”?..."
Gordon Marsden - View Speech

View all Gordon Marsden (Lab - Blackpool South) contributions to the debate on: Inherited Social Housing Tenancies

Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 27 Nov 2013
DWP Offices (Fylde)

"I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, my constituency neighbour, for giving way. I want to reinforce the point he is making. Does he agree that the complexities and difficulties in the area are exacerbated by the fact that public transport access to Peel Park is still problematic?..."
Gordon Marsden - View Speech

View all Gordon Marsden (Lab - Blackpool South) contributions to the debate on: DWP Offices (Fylde)

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 10 Jul 2013
Disabled People

"My right hon. Friend is making his position clear with great power and pugnaciousness. Is it not already clear that the chaos around the work capability assessment and the implementation of the personal independence payment is widespread? In the House last year, I cited dozens of cases of disabled people …..."
Gordon Marsden - View Speech

View all Gordon Marsden (Lab - Blackpool South) contributions to the debate on: Disabled People

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Nov 2010
Housing Benefit

"I wish to put on record that however important the change is in London and the south-east, it is not simply an issue for that area. Does my right hon. Friend agree that the Department’s own figures, which show that some 5,500 local housing allowance recipients in Blackpool will lose …..."
Gordon Marsden - View Speech

View all Gordon Marsden (Lab - Blackpool South) contributions to the debate on: Housing Benefit

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Nov 2010
Housing Benefit

"The right hon. Gentleman is setting the cap and justifying the 10% cut for the long-term unemployed on the basis that people will be moved from welfare into work. Does he not realise that part of that process involves retraining and reskilling? If he does realise that, why has there …..."
Gordon Marsden - View Speech

View all Gordon Marsden (Lab - Blackpool South) contributions to the debate on: Housing Benefit