All 1 Grahame Morris contributions to the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Tue 30th Jan 2018
Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill (Fifth sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee Debate: 5th sitting: House of Commons

Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill (Fifth sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for International Trade

Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Grahame Morris Excerpts
Committee Debate: 5th sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 30th January 2018

(6 years, 2 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 30 January 2018 - (30 Jan 2018)
Graham Stuart Portrait Graham Stuart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I would go further than that. By having a system that is entirely aligned with and attuned to the interests only of UK producers, we hope to have a better system than the one we have now. I cannot give firm timelines, because the TRA is not set up yet, but hopefully it will be speedier, more proportionate and balanced, absolutely scrupulous in observing WTO case law, flexible enough to implement it, better attuned to the needs of UK producers, and more effective at averting injury to them.

Grahame Morris Portrait Grahame Morris (Easington) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for giving way and hope he will bear with me. Given the emphasis he is placing on the importance of secondary legislation, and the fact that, as he said a moment ago, the TRA has not been set up yet, has he had a chance to reconsider putting trade union representatives on the TRA?

Graham Stuart Portrait Graham Stuart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It took the hon. Gentleman’s contribution finally to silence the hon. Member for Scunthorpe, who normally heckles throughout everyone’s address—[Interruption.]. As has rightly been said, that is harsh but fair.

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question. The aim is that this should be an expert body, that the normal, rigorous civil service appointments process should be observed in its appointment and that we should have an organisation that has impartiality and effectiveness as its primary concerns, rather than being driven by political or indeed representative considerations. That is what we are planning to do.

Question put, That the amendment be made.