Courts Service Estate Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Courts Service Estate

Guy Opperman Excerpts
Tuesday 14th December 2010

(13 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jonathan Djanogly Portrait Mr Djanogly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend made a very cogent case for the retention of his court, and put the local case very strongly. I have to say that the judgment was finely balanced, but ultimately this decision was taken because the utilisation rate in the Surrey courts has been below 80%, and transferring work to Staines and Guildford magistrates courts will result in the rate increasing to 89%.

Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman (Hexham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I disclose my former profession as a barrister. Tynedale in Northumberland has almost 1,000 square miles without a court. The consultation used poor-quality figures and they were badly applied. If they are wrong, does the Minister accept that the claim is capable of judicial review?

Jonathan Djanogly Portrait Mr Djanogly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We do not believe that the figures we consulted on were wrong.