Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Oral Answers to Questions

Helen Morgan Excerpts
Tuesday 11th November 2025

(1 day, 13 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sarah Sackman Portrait Sarah Sackman
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The review of criminal law in this area is incredibly delicate, and we need to look at it in line with common law and case law, but we are keeping it under review.

Helen Morgan Portrait Helen Morgan (North Shropshire) (LD)
- Hansard - -

7. What steps he is taking to tackle backlogs in the courts.

Luke Murphy Portrait Luke Murphy (Basingstoke) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

22. What steps he is taking to help tackle court backlogs.

Helen Morgan Portrait Helen Morgan
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for her answer. The situation she describes is similar to one that I am about to describe. A constituent of mine got in touch about a case of historical sexual abuse, which they bravely reported in 2018. After years of waiting, a trial date was set for this May, only for it to be put back again until July 2027—nine years after first reporting the case. I am sure, Mr Speaker, you can imagine the toll that has taken on my constituent’s mental health and wellbeing. I urge the Minister to progress at speed with her reform of the Courts Service and, in particular, address the problems in Shropshire where there are significant issues with the Crown court and magistrates court service.

Sarah Sackman Portrait Sarah Sackman
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am incredibly sorry to hear about the hon. Lady’s constituent’s experience and I reiterate my sympathies. She articulates, with that case, precisely why it is vital that we pursue reform. Timeliness is an essential ingredient of fairness and the state’s obligation is to deliver fair trials. That is why we will do whatever it takes to bear down on the backlog as we bring forward our response to Sir Brian Leveson’s review.