Debates between Huw Merriman and John Bercow during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Huw Merriman and John Bercow
Wednesday 2nd November 2016

(7 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ben Gummer Portrait The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General (Ben Gummer)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government are striving towards their manifesto commitment to achieve £20 billion of annual efficiency savings by 2020. Cabinet Office functions are supporting Departments by providing expert support and advice in all areas, including commercial property, infrastructure, fraud and error, and debt. In addition, I will be leading a review with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to see whether further savings are possible over that period.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I know the House will want to join me in congratulating the Minister on the recent arrival of his second child, a brother for Wilfred.

Huw Merriman Portrait Huw Merriman
- Hansard - -

May I add my congratulations as well? I thank the Minister for his answer. How much did the Government deliver in efficiency savings over the last term and how much is to come?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Huw Merriman and John Bercow
Thursday 28th April 2016

(8 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Huw Merriman Portrait Huw Merriman (Bexhill and Battle) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Constituents of mine wishing to get back to Bexhill and Battle after 9 o’clock on a Monday or Tuesday night are having to undertake a large portion of their journey by replacement bus, and we have just found out that that will carry on for the rest of the year. I declare an interest because that impacts on me on a Monday evening, but my intentions, as ever, are purely altruistic when I ask the Minister whether she would meet me to try to find out whether Network Rail can conduct this engineering work during the night.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is good that the hon. Gentleman is doing more than just talking to himself about the matter. That is very encouraging.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Huw Merriman and John Bercow
Tuesday 1st March 2016

(8 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Sit down. This is about Government policy, and progress is slower than at previous Treasury questions. The Minister should try to stick to Government policy, upon which briefly he can, and should, speak.

Huw Merriman Portrait Huw Merriman (Bexhill and Battle) (Con)
- Hansard - -

5. What fiscal steps he is taking to help first-time homebuyers.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Huw Merriman and John Bercow
Thursday 14th January 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Now a lawyer who is not a member of the Welsh legal fraternity, but we want to hear from him anyway. I call Huw Merriman.

Huw Merriman Portrait Huw Merriman (Bexhill and Battle) (Con)
- Hansard - -

13. What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the law on the discharge of firearms by police officers.

Housing

Debate between Huw Merriman and John Bercow
Tuesday 15th December 2015

(8 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Huw Merriman Portrait Huw Merriman (Bexhill and Battle) (Con)
- Hansard - -

We are simply not building enough to keep up with both the demand and the challenges that are faced by many of our constituents who want to buy homes of their own. Government initiatives are radical and welcome, but I would advocate further action, and I hope that the Government will consider some of the following proposals.

First, there is a need to build on green spaces. Nearly 80% of my constituency is designated as “area of outstanding natural beauty”. There is a shortage of land afforded for local employment, but where there is such land, it is on brownfield sites. If the tens of thousands of houses that my district councils intend to build are allocated to brownfield employment sites, where will our current and next generations of homeowners work?

In one of my parishes, the village petitioned the district council to allow a small housing complex to be built on a green field just outside the building boundary. As a result of the campaign for building to be allowed on that green site, Etchingham now has a new school, a new village hall, and new affordable housing—all of it courtesy of that bold move. I should like the Government to make it easier to allow parish and town councils to make such decisions. When a district council has a plan, parishes and towns are required to conform to it; if they do not do so, their own local plans will not be approved by the district council. I should like to free parishes and towns from the shackles of district plan compliance. If they want to designate a site, then let them do so, and let them override district plans for their own purposes if that is within the planning laws.

Secondly, there is a need to deliver more infrastructure. Although the argument that more housing is required is being won, there is a real fear that communities will not have schools, doctors and other essential public services until the housing has been completed. If authorities could deliver infrastructure at the same time as building began, the public might embrace the building of more housing, and might even ask for more housing than had been scoped if, say, a new secondary school would be built with a few hundred more houses. I should like local authorities to be given the power to borrow money against the receipts from new homes bonuses, although, of course, that would work only if the new homes bonus scheme were extended for as long as the plans.

Thirdly, consent needs to be turned into new homes. The amount of land where planning consent has been granted but work has not begun continues to cause concern. The lack of building not only adds to the problem of a shortage of housing numbers, but also deprives local authorities of the ability to collect receipts from section funding or community infrastructure levies. I would support a policy that required developers to pay a first instalment of section 106 moneys within 12 months of the granting of planning consent, rather than on the completion of developments. Such a policy would not only incentivise house building and increase stock, but would permit local authorities to deliver vital infrastructure in parallel with house building.

The need to tackle our housing shortage is a huge priority. It is a national tragedy that more is not being done, but I support the Government on what is being done.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call Mr Zeichner to speak for two minutes.