Higher Education Fees Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Ian Mearns

Main Page: Ian Mearns (Labour - Gateshead)

Higher Education Fees

Ian Mearns Excerpts
Thursday 9th December 2010

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Pat Glass Portrait Pat Glass
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I agree. It goes further than that, however. Professions such as medicine, dentistry, law and architecture should be representative of the society they serve, but despite all the efforts to achieve that, they remain largely populated by people from higher-income families. The Secretary of State comes to the Chamber and lectures us, saying it is unacceptable that only 46 young people on free school meals went to Oxbridge last year. I agree that that is unacceptable, but I do not think even the Secretary of State, operating out of his ivory tower on the top floor of Sanctuary Buildings, can possibly believe these proposals will improve that. Evidence from the Secretary of State’s own Department clearly shows that students from lower socio-economic backgrounds are more debt-averse than others. These proposals are highly damaging, and will result in fewer, not more, young people on free school meals and on low incomes getting to university, let alone Oxbridge.

Ian Mearns Portrait Ian Mearns (Gateshead) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I thank my very good hon. Friend for giving way. Social mobility is an important issue, because it is not just about tuition fees. The coalition Government have cut child trust funds, child benefit for some, school sport partnerships funds, Building Schools for the Future, education maintenance allowance awards and the future jobs fund. They are also scrapping Aimhigher and are now trebling tuition fees. What have they got against children and young people?