Battle of the Somme: 110th Anniversary

Jack Abbott Excerpts

Thursday 12th November 2026 Commons Chamber

[Jack Abbott (Ipswich) (Lab/Co-op)]

I thank the hon. Member for South West Devon (Rebecca Smith) for bringing this debate to mark the 110th anniversary of the battle of the Somme coming to an end. That is 110 years since young men from Ipswich, Suffolk and communities across Britain bravely went into battle, facing extraordinary danger in the service of their country, but many never came home. More than a century has passed, but the sacrifice that they made and the loss suffered by their families must never be forgotten.

For many men, the Somme would be their final battle. Back home in Ipswich and Suffolk, families waited for their fathers, sons, brothers and husbands to come home; instead, they were left with the devastating news of their deaths and the knowledge that the lives they had imagined for them and with them would never be lived. They were soldiers who answered their country’s call with extraordinary courage, but they were also young men with hopes, ambitions and their whole lives ahead of them. For so many, their lives were cut tragically short on the fields of Europe. For the families left behind in Ipswich, the war did not end when the guns fell silent; it ended with a telegram through the door, an empty chair at the dinner table or a photograph of a loved one who would never come home.

More than 100 men from Ipswich lost their lives during the Somme offensive—more than 100 families in our town were left to live with a grief that no passage of time could ever fully erase—and I want to put some of their names on the record today. Private Harold Bailey was just 19 years old when he was killed—an age at which so many young people begin their adult lives, make plans and dream of their futures. Private William Attewell was 21. Private Vivian Bradley was 19. Private Walter Fiddaman was also 19. Those young men served in the Suffolk Regiment and came from our town and our county. They grew up on our streets and belonged to our communities, but they never came home.

On 3 January 1916, the 7th Battalion, Suffolk Regiment took part in a devastating attack on Ovillers. The battalion suffered 470 casualties, including all its company commanders. Among the Ipswich men lost were Benjamin Baker and Arthur Holmes. Just 12 days later, on 15 July 1916, the 4th Battalion suffered more than 200 casualties during the fighting around Bazentin Ridge and High Wood. Seventeen Ipswich men lost their lives that day. Among them were Samuel Jennings, aged 19, and Robert Lloyd, aged just 18—a young man who had a whole life ahead of him. More than 1 million men were killed over the four-month period that the fighting raged, but every single one of those deaths was a life extinguished and a family devastated.

This week, I joined hundreds of people in Ipswich to pay tribute at Christchurch Park and the fields of honour in Ipswich Old Cemetery. As the “Last Post” sounded and our town fell silent, I thought about the young men from Ipswich who had been killed on the battlefield.

Ipswich and Suffolk have a proud and enduring history of service to our country, from the Suffolk Regiment on the Somme to the radar pioneers at Bawdsey. Our town and our county have given so much to the defence of our nation, but remembrance is not simply about pride and honour, as crucial as they are; it is about grief. It is about recognising the terrible human cost of war and understanding that the freedoms we enjoy today were secured by people who paid such a heavy price that we can scarcely comprehend. They gave their tomorrow for our today, and we will remember them.

Armed Forces Bill

Jack Abbott Excerpts

2nd reading
Monday 26th January 2026 Commons Chamber

[Jack Abbott (Ipswich) (Lab/Co-op)]

It is a privilege to speak in this debate on the Armed Forces Bill. Every five years, Parliament is asked to renew its consent for the maintenance of our armed forces in peacetime. That constitutional requirement, dating back to the Bill of Rights in 1688, is more than a procedural necessity; it is about Parliament renewing the contract between the nation and those who serve it. This Bill reflects the changing nature of warfare, the evolving needs of our service personnel and their families, and our duty—collective and enduring—to ensure that those who defend our country are supported not only in uniform, but throughout their lives.

As the Member of Parliament for Ipswich, I represent a town and a county deeply entwined with the story of our national defence. Suffolk’s contribution to the armed forces is profound and long-standing. From Bawdsey on our coast, where the world’s first operational radar station became a decisive force in the battle of Britain, to the air bases that have hosted generations of service personnel, our county has quietly but decisively shaped Britain’s security and, indeed, our history. The innovations developed in Suffolk saved lives, shortened the war and changed the course of our history.

That legacy reminds us of the fundamental truth that our national security is rooted in people, places and communities, and this Bill recognises that by placing people, service personnel and their families at its heart. At this point, I would like to reflect on President Trump’s comments last week. Ipswich’s Aaron McClure, of 1st Battalion, the Royal Anglian Regiment, died alongside two colleagues on active service in Afghanistan. He was just 19 years old. His mother, Lorraine, was right when she said that President Trump’s comments were an insult to his legacy and that of his colleagues.

Turning to the armed forces covenant, the Bill fulfils a clear manifesto commitment by fully enshrining the covenant in law. It extends the covenant’s legal duty beyond local authorities and public bodies to include central Government Departments and the devolved Administrations, and it broadens the range of policy areas to which due regard must be given. This matters deeply. The covenant is a promise from the nation that those who serve or have served and their families will be treated with fairness and respect, and will face no disadvantage because of their service. For far too long, that promise has been honoured inconsistently: veterans have struggled to access healthcare, families have faced disruption in their education, and housing standards have far too often fallen short of what is acceptable. By strengthening this legal duty, the Bill moves the covenant from an aspiration to accountability, it embeds fairness in decision making, and it ensures that public bodies right across our country take responsibility for delivering it.

That legal framework is vital, but legislation alone is not enough. Covenant delivery also depends on strong community institutions. In Ipswich, one such institution is Combat2Coffee, a community interest company, founded by ex-soldier Nigel Seaman, that has become a national model of veteran-led support. Combat2Coffee exists to improve the mental health and wellbeing of the armed forces community and their families. It does so through something deceptively simple: connection. Through coffee mornings, outreach, volunteering and employment pathways, it rebuilds the sense of belonging that many veterans lose when they leave uniform. In 2025 alone, Combat2Coffee supported more than 200 veterans through outreach activities, with more than 2,000 people attending armed forces community coffee mornings. Earlier this year, the organisation’s volunteers were awarded the King’s award for voluntary service, which is the highest honour a voluntary group can receive. That recognition reflects not only the scale of their impact, but the depth of their understanding that mental health is not a niche issue but a continuum, and that early community-based support saves lives.

During Armed Forces Week, I was proud to attend Combat2Coffee’s “Bigger Breakfast” in Ipswich, alongside the Armed Forces Minister and the former Ipswich Town and England captain, Terry Butcher. Terry has long been a passionate advocate for veterans’ wellbeing, informed by his own family’s experience, and his support for this work underlines why strong, compassionate mental health provision for veterans truly matters. Hundreds of serving personnel, veterans and cadets came together not for speeches or ceremonies, but to talk, connect and support one another. My hon. and gallant friend the Armed Forces Minister is a highly decorated individual, but should he so wish, I am sure he would have the title of chief barista.

Housing is also critical. The establishment of the Defence Housing Service through the Bill is long overdue. For decades, defence housing has suffered from under-investment, fragmented responsibility and a “fix on fail” culture that has eroded trust among service families. Last year’s defence housing strategy represents the biggest change in military housing in half a century. The Bill gives that strategy institutional form. The new Defence Housing Service will be responsible for improving quality, increasing availability, regenerating defence land and, crucially, placing a service ethos at the centre of housing provision. For families posted in Suffolk, that will mean homes that meet modern standards, transparent complaints processes and a system that recognises that housing is not a perk but an operational necessity.

[David Burton-Sampson (Southend West and Leigh) (Lab)]

Like many Members across the House, I am on the armed forces parliamentary scheme, and I get to meet some incredible people through training, including people who are serving. They are totally committed and ready to serve this country when they may need to. Does my hon. Friend agree that this provision for decent housing is the least that we can do to thank them?

[Jack Abbott]

My hon. Friend is completely right. What I was just about to say encapsulates what my hon. Friend says: stability at home underpins readiness, retention and morale.

Readiness itself is another core theme of the Bill. In an increasingly uncertain world, with evolving threats, rapid technological change and heightened global instability, the measures relating to reserve forces reflect the reality of modern defence—that experience matters, that flexibility is essential, and that the boundary between regular and reserve service must be more permeable. By increasing the maximum age of recall, enabling seamless transfers between regular and reserve forces, and granting the Secretary of State power to authorise recall for warlike operations, the Bill strengthens our ability to respond to emerging threats while respecting the voluntary nature of reserve service through appropriate opt-outs.

The provisions on uncrewed devices are similarly necessary. The threat posed by hostile drone activity around defence sites is real and growing, so granting defence personnel the power to use approved equipment to detect, prevent and defeat drone-related offences is not an expansion of power for its own sake, but a proportionate response to a changing and growing threat environment.

From the radar pioneers at Bawdsey to the volunteers roasting coffee for Combat2Coffee in Ipswich and across Suffolk, our local contribution to the armed forces reminds us that defence is not simply confined to bases or battlefields; it lives in innovation, in service and in community. For those reasons, on behalf of the many serving personnel, veterans and families in Ipswich and right across Suffolk, I am proud to support the Bill.