To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 14 Mar 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Jeff Smith (Lab - Manchester, Withington) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Primodos
Thursday 14th March 2024

Asked by: Jeff Smith (Labour - Manchester, Withington)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether she has made an assessment of the potential implications for her Department’s policies of the report by the APPG on Hormone Pregnancy Test entitled Bitter Pill: Primodos - the forgotten thalidomide, published on 27 February 2024.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

We remain hugely sympathetic to the families who believe that they have suffered due to the use of Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs). In 2017 an independent Expert Working Group conducted a comprehensive review of the available scientific evidence, and concluded that the data did not support a causal association between the use of HPTs, such as Primodos, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This remains the Government’s position. The Government has committed to reviewing any new evidence related to HPTs, and a possible causal association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Written Question
Primodos
Thursday 14th March 2024

Asked by: Jeff Smith (Labour - Manchester, Withington)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will implement the recommendations in the report by the APPG on Hormone Pregnancy Test entitled Bitter Pill: Primodos - the forgotten thalidomide, published on 27 February 2024.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

We remain hugely sympathetic to the families who believe that they have suffered due to the use of Hormone Pregnancy Tests (HPTs). In 2017 an independent Expert Working Group conducted a comprehensive review of the available scientific evidence, and concluded that the data did not support a causal association between the use of HPTs, such as Primodos, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This remains the Government’s position. The Government has committed to reviewing any new evidence related to HPTs, and a possible causal association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Jeff Smith (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 293
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Jeff Smith (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 147
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Jeff Smith (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 292
Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Feb 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Jeff Smith (Lab - Manchester, Withington) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Feb 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Jeff Smith (Lab - Manchester, Withington) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Jeff Smith (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 150 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 294
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Jeff Smith (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 151 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 306