Debates between Jeremy Hunt and Richard Burgon during the 2019 Parliament

Mortgage Charter

Debate between Jeremy Hunt and Richard Burgon
Monday 26th June 2023

(10 months, 2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Hunt Portrait Jeremy Hunt
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Notwithstanding the fact that 85% of mortgages are now fixed to some degree, an extra 1.2 million families will feel the increase in interest rates over the months between now and the end of the year. That will be felt by many families, but we should do everything in our power to tackle inflation, because in the end that is the only way to end the misery for so many people.

Richard Burgon Portrait Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Many of the banks that the Chancellor has been talking about are raking in bumper profits by refusing to pass on higher interest rates to their savers. Surely, a windfall tax on those additional profits would allow the Government to provide mortgage holders with the kind of support they really need at this time. Before the Chancellor dismisses that idea, may I gently remind him that even Margaret Thatcher imposed such a windfall tax on banks’ excess profits?

Jeremy Hunt Portrait Jeremy Hunt
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I hear what the hon. Gentleman says, but he will be pleased to know that banks already pay a 3% surcharge on their corporation tax—they pay 3% more than everyone else—as well as a levy on their balance sheets.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jeremy Hunt and Richard Burgon
Tuesday 7th February 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Hunt Portrait Jeremy Hunt
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend is right to raise that issue. That is why I met Martin Lewis and the six big mortgage lenders before Christmas. We are very alive to those concerns and will monitor the situation closely.

Richard Burgon Portrait Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

It would cost around £1 billion to give nurses an inflation-matching pay rise. Scrapping the non-dom tax avoidance scheme used by the super-rich would raise more than £3 billion. Why, then, is the Chancellor putting non-doms before nurses?

Economic Update

Debate between Jeremy Hunt and Richard Burgon
Monday 17th October 2022

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Hunt Portrait Jeremy Hunt
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I can confirm that the council’s members will be independent; I can confirm that there will be no improper influence exerted; and I can confirm, as the hon. Gentleman will be pleased to hear, that all donations to the Conservative party are vetted and legal.

Richard Burgon Portrait Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have listened carefully to what the Chancellor has said. Our public services are on their knees after 12 years of Tory misrule; they really cannot cope with any further cuts. In contrast, the very richest have seen their wealth soar threefold over the past decade. Surely, rather than further cuts to our public services, would it not be fairer to impose a wealth tax on the very richest in our society?

Jeremy Hunt Portrait Jeremy Hunt
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The trouble with those kinds of taxes is that they end up inhibiting the wealth-creating capacity of the economy to fund the very public services that the hon. Gentleman supports. I support wealthier people paying more tax, but only when it creates more resources to put into the public services that we all need.