All 2 Debates between John Glen and Christian Wakeford

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between John Glen and Christian Wakeford
Thursday 25th April 2024

(5 days, 7 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Glen Portrait The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General (John Glen)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Prime Minister is responsible for the ministerial code, and is the ultimate judge of the standards of behaviour expected of Ministers, which are set out in that code. All Ministers are expected to uphold the principles of the code, as the Prime Minister has made clear.

Christian Wakeford Portrait Christian Wakeford
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

On 19 April, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments wrote to the Deputy Prime Minister to report a breach of the rules by the former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in relation to a visit to Venezuela to meet President Maduro on behalf of the hedge fund Merlyn Advisors. Was the Cabinet Office aware of the visit in advance, and did the Deputy Prime Minister—the Secretary of State—or officials have a conversation with the Foreign Office about any tax-funded briefings that he may have received?

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Government expect all former Ministers, including Prime Ministers, to abide by their obligations with regard to the business appointment rules set out in the ministerial code. The Cabinet Office is currently considering a letter on this matter from the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, and will respond in due course.

--- Later in debate ---
John Glen Portrait John Glen
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I do not accept that at all. Of course, Ms Ahmar withdrew her allegations completely on the eve of having them scrutinised at the higher tribunal, so I do not accept that, and it is absolutely right that senior civil servants take action when there are performance issues with the staff under them, without fear of allegations being made against them.

Christian Wakeford Portrait Christian Wakeford (Bury South) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Further to the question asked by my right hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull North (Dame Diana Johnson) about the infected blood scandal, the Cumberlege report highlighted over three years ago the need for redress for victims of the sodium valproate, vaginal mesh and Primodos scandals. What progress has been made on redress for those victims?

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I am sorry; I am not able to give an answer on those other scandals. There was a Backbench Business debate on redress schemes last Thursday, to which the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office, my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart) replied. I believe that work is ongoing, but I will have to write to the hon. Gentleman to give him a thorough answer on the matter.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between John Glen and Christian Wakeford
Thursday 29th February 2024

(2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Christian Wakeford Portrait Christian Wakeford (Bury South) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

On the contaminated blood scandal, why have the Government not named the experts?

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We have given details of the appointment of Sir Jonathan Montgomery, and a number of other individuals are working on clinical and other matters. It is really important that we get on with this work, and we will report back on their conclusions as soon as we can.