John Glen Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for John Glen

Information between 15th June 2025 - 5th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
30 Jun 2025 - Draft Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Suitability for Fixed Term Recall) Order 2025 - View Vote Context
John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 6
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 20 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 291
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 8 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 379 Noes - 137
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 9 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 379
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 336
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 428
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 328
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 335


Speeches
John Glen speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Glen contributed 1 speech (59 words)
Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Commons Chamber
HM Treasury
John Glen speeches from: Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill
John Glen contributed 2 speeches (882 words)
2nd reading
Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
John Glen speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Glen contributed 1 speech (50 words)
Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence
John Glen speeches from: Welfare Reform
John Glen contributed 2 speeches (137 words)
Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
John Glen speeches from: Glastonbury Festival: BBC Coverage
John Glen contributed 1 speech (151 words)
Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
John Glen speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Glen contributed 1 speech (119 words)
Monday 16th June 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Education


Written Answers
Sodium Valproate: Compensation
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Wednesday 25th June 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what discussions his Department has had with the Treasury on (a) the Hughes Report and the recommendations for valproate, (b) redress for those harmed by sodium valproate.

Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is carefully considering the work by the Patient Safety Commissioner and her report, which set out options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh. This is a complex issue involving input from different Government departments. The Government will provide a further update to the Patient Safety Commissioner’s report in due course.

Life Sciences: Venture Capital
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Friday 27th June 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the British Business Bank's publication Small Business Equity Tracker 2024, if she will make a comparative assessment of (a) venture capital investment in the life sciences in the UK and the US and (b) the implications for companies in each jurisdiction seeking to scale-up.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The UK remains Europe’s leading destination for life sciences venture capital (VC) investment, according to the British Business Bank’s Small Business Equity Tracker 2024.

The US market is larger in scale, supporting late-stage growth with deeper capital pools and larger fund sizes. While the UK VC market is competitive with the US at the seed stage, UK companies face a widening funding gap as they scale.

At the recent Spending Review, the Government increased the British Business Bank’s financial capacity to £25.6 billion, a two-thirds increase in investment activity. Alongside reforms to give the British Business Bank greater flexibility to deploy funding responsively, this expanded capacity will enable more substantial support for SMEs and scale-ups, including life sciences companies, and move the UK market closer to the scale of late-stage financing seen in the US.

Local Government: Pension Funds
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Friday 27th June 2025

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, under what circumstances she would direct Local Government Pension Funds to a specific asset pool.

Answered by Jim McMahon - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The government’s firm preference is for pool membership to be determined on a voluntary basis at a local level. In the Pension Schemes Bill, the government has made provision for a power to protect the Local Government Pension Scheme over the long term. The power could be used to direct an administering authority to participate in a specific pool in the event that an authority is left without a pool to participate in or that a pool’s governance intractably breaks down. The government would intend only to use this power as a backstop in these circumstances.

Life Sciences: Finance
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Friday 27th June 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the Spending Review 2025, published on 11 June 2025, how much and what proportion of the additional British Business Bank funding will be allocated to the life sciences sector.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

This Government is committed to ensuring high-potential life sciences businesses can access the finance they need to innovate, grow, and boost the UK economy.

As part of the Industrial Strategy, the British Business Bank will invest £4 billion across key sectors, including life sciences, supporting both the expansion of the Life Sciences Investment Programme and direct investment in R&D-intensive companies.

This funding is not hypothecated by sector, allowing the Bank to back the most promising opportunities, including through specialist fund managers.

The percentage of Bank supported deals in life sciences was 7.2%, compared to 4.9% for the overall equity market and 6.1% for the wider PE/VC market from 2022-2024.

Pakistan: Girls
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Tuesday 1st July 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what recent assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of reports of (a) abductions, (b) forced marriages and (c) religious conversions of (i) Christian and (ii) other minority girls in Pakistan.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

Promoting the rights of religious minorities is a core part of the UK's diplomatic engagement in Pakistan. I am deeply concerned by reports of abductions, forced marriages and religious conversions of Christian and other minority girls. I raised the importance of protecting minority rights with Pakistan's Minister for Human Rights during my visit in November 2024 and Lord Khan raised this in meetings with senior Government of Pakistan interlocutors during his visit in April 2025. Our High Commission in Islamabad continues to raise these issues at the highest levels and engages regularly with civil society to monitor the situation. We urge the Government of Pakistan to uphold its international human rights obligations and ensure that all citizens, regardless of faith, are protected from coercion and violence.

Credit: Regulation
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Monday 23rd June 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that consumers are made aware that some forms of buy now, pay later will remain unregulated when BNPL regulation is in force.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

Regulating the Buy-Now, Pay-Later (BNPL) sector is a government priority. On 19 May, the government introduced legislation to bring BNPL products into regulation. Our legislative approach will disapply the elements of the consumer credit regulatory regime that were originally designed for interest-bearing loans. This will enable the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to create a proportionate information disclosure regime tailored specifically to BNPL products.

At this stage, the government considers that BNPL agreements provided directly by merchants should remain exempt from regulation. Including merchant-provided BNPL in the regime would disproportionately impact small businesses offering low-risk agreements such as gym memberships and instalment plans for invoices.

Consumers using merchant-provided BNPL will remain protected by wider consumer protection laws, including strict rules on advertising and financial promotions; and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, which prohibit unfair commercial practices such as misleading consumers.

The government has not seen evidence that merchants are seeking to offer BNPL agreements on a scale similar to third-party lenders. However, my officials and I will continue to monitor the merchant-provided BNPL market closely, working with the FCA and industry. If we see clear evidence of significant market expansion or large-scale consumer harm, we will intervene swiftly to address these risks.

Credit: Regulation
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Monday 23rd June 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department plans to require merchants that might offer unregulated Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) once BNPL regulation is in force to provide clear information to consumers to make it clear that certain consumer protections will not apply to their credit agreements.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

Regulating the Buy-Now, Pay-Later (BNPL) sector is a government priority. On 19 May, the government introduced legislation to bring BNPL products into regulation. Our legislative approach will disapply the elements of the consumer credit regulatory regime that were originally designed for interest-bearing loans. This will enable the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to create a proportionate information disclosure regime tailored specifically to BNPL products.

At this stage, the government considers that BNPL agreements provided directly by merchants should remain exempt from regulation. Including merchant-provided BNPL in the regime would disproportionately impact small businesses offering low-risk agreements such as gym memberships and instalment plans for invoices.

Consumers using merchant-provided BNPL will remain protected by wider consumer protection laws, including strict rules on advertising and financial promotions; and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, which prohibit unfair commercial practices such as misleading consumers.

The government has not seen evidence that merchants are seeking to offer BNPL agreements on a scale similar to third-party lenders. However, my officials and I will continue to monitor the merchant-provided BNPL market closely, working with the FCA and industry. If we see clear evidence of significant market expansion or large-scale consumer harm, we will intervene swiftly to address these risks.

Credit: Regulation
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Monday 23rd June 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that the Financial Conduct Authority is able to deliver final rules for Buy Now, Pay Later regulation that are proportionate to the product.

Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

Regulating the Buy-Now, Pay-Later (BNPL) sector is a government priority. On 19 May, the government introduced legislation to bring BNPL products into regulation. Our legislative approach will disapply the elements of the consumer credit regulatory regime that were originally designed for interest-bearing loans. This will enable the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to create a proportionate information disclosure regime tailored specifically to BNPL products.

At this stage, the government considers that BNPL agreements provided directly by merchants should remain exempt from regulation. Including merchant-provided BNPL in the regime would disproportionately impact small businesses offering low-risk agreements such as gym memberships and instalment plans for invoices.

Consumers using merchant-provided BNPL will remain protected by wider consumer protection laws, including strict rules on advertising and financial promotions; and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, which prohibit unfair commercial practices such as misleading consumers.

The government has not seen evidence that merchants are seeking to offer BNPL agreements on a scale similar to third-party lenders. However, my officials and I will continue to monitor the merchant-provided BNPL market closely, working with the FCA and industry. If we see clear evidence of significant market expansion or large-scale consumer harm, we will intervene swiftly to address these risks.

Nepal: Christianity
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to support the protection of religious freedom for Christian communities in Nepal, in the context of (a) recent political movements advocating for the restoration of a Hindu kingdom and (b) trends in the number of attacks on Christians.

Answered by Catherine West - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK condemns all forms of discrimination based on religion or belief, recognising that freedom of religion is a cornerstone of human rights and democratic societies. Our Embassy in Kathmandu engages a range of different faith leaders and civil society on human rights. Through this and other engagement, the UK will continue to signal respect for religious diversity and support for everyone's right to freely practise their faith, traditions, and beliefs without fear or prejudice.

Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate her Department has made of the market cost of therapeutic support interventions delivered via the Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund, and what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the new reduced Fair Access Limit of £3000 per application to cover the support required, based on those costs.

Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The department took a range of factors into account when setting the new £3,000 fair access limit for the adoption and special guardianship support fund (ASGSF). In the 2024/25 financial year, the average cost per ASGSF recipient was £3,170 for therapy and £2,399 for specialist assessments (£3,090 overall). In addition, since July 2024, the department has collected detailed data on the costs of applications for therapeutic interventions and specialist assessments funded by the ASGSF. Using this information, the department assessed that £3,000 could fund an average of 19-20 hours of therapy, on the basis of median hourly rates for contact time and allowing for additional costs.

Where ASGSF funding has been used for a specialist assessment, remaining funding up to the £3,000 fair access limit may be used for therapy, where this is assessed as being needed. If appropriate, local authorities and regional adoption agencies may use their own funding to offer extra therapy.

Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what information her Department holds on the market costs of specialist assessments given under the Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund; and whether applicants applying for an assessment of need will also receive therapy under that fund.

Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The department took a range of factors into account when setting the new £3,000 fair access limit for the adoption and special guardianship support fund (ASGSF). In the 2024/25 financial year, the average cost per ASGSF recipient was £3,170 for therapy and £2,399 for specialist assessments (£3,090 overall). In addition, since July 2024, the department has collected detailed data on the costs of applications for therapeutic interventions and specialist assessments funded by the ASGSF. Using this information, the department assessed that £3,000 could fund an average of 19-20 hours of therapy, on the basis of median hourly rates for contact time and allowing for additional costs.

Where ASGSF funding has been used for a specialist assessment, remaining funding up to the £3,000 fair access limit may be used for therapy, where this is assessed as being needed. If appropriate, local authorities and regional adoption agencies may use their own funding to offer extra therapy.

Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what the (a) allocated Departmental budget, (b) amount of overspend, (c) amount of surrendered funds not used by local authorities and (d) amount of surrendered funds repurposed for other applications for the adoption and special guardianship support fund was in (i) 2023-24 and (ii) 2024-25.

Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The table below provides the data requested on the adoption and special guardianship support fund (ASGSF).

2023/24 financial year

2024/25 financial year

Average amount of ASGSF funding awarded per recipient (total covers therapy and specialist assessments combined)

£3,044

£3,090

Allocated departmental budget

£48,000,000

£49,000,000

Overspend

£639,996.35

£11,355,181.91

Surrendered funds

£11,268,383.37

£13,894,781.10

All surrendered funding from 2023/24 and 2024/25 was repurposed for other ASGSF applications and added to the total spend.

Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what data her Department holds on the average amount of funding allocated per child awarded via the Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund in the (a) 2023-24 and (b) 2024-25 financial years.

Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The table below provides the data requested on the adoption and special guardianship support fund (ASGSF).

2023/24 financial year

2024/25 financial year

Average amount of ASGSF funding awarded per recipient (total covers therapy and specialist assessments combined)

£3,044

£3,090

Allocated departmental budget

£48,000,000

£49,000,000

Overspend

£639,996.35

£11,355,181.91

Surrendered funds

£11,268,383.37

£13,894,781.10

All surrendered funding from 2023/24 and 2024/25 was repurposed for other ASGSF applications and added to the total spend.




John Glen mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill
300 speeches (47,251 words)
2nd reading
Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Mentions:
1: Chris McDonald (Lab - Stockton North) Member for Salisbury (John Glen) talked about the lack of productive capacity. - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 1st July 2025
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury

Treasury Committee

Found: meeting Members present: Dame Meg Hillier (Chair); Dame Harriett Baldwin; Rachel Blake; Bobby Dean; John Glen

Tuesday 1st July 2025
Oral Evidence - National Wealth Fund

Treasury Committee

Found: meeting Members present: Dame Meg Hillier (Chair); Dame Harriett Baldwin; Rachel Blake; Bobby Dean; John Glen

Monday 30th June 2025
Report - 8th Report - Lifetime Individual Savings Account

Treasury Committee

Found: (Liberal Democrat; Dorking and Horley) Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat; Carshalton and Wallington) John Glen

Wednesday 25th June 2025
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury

Treasury Committee

Found: John Glen: I understand. Thank you.

Tuesday 24th June 2025
Oral Evidence - University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, and Societal Aspects of Credit

Treasury Committee

Found: present: Dame Meg Hillier (Chair); Dame Harriett Baldwin; Rachel Blake; Chris Coghlan; Bobby Dean; John Glen

Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Orbex, Green Alliance, and UK BioIndustry Association

Treasury Committee

Found: John Glen: Yes.

Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Siemens Energy UK&I and Siemens Gamesa UK, Future Energy Networks, and First Light Fusion

Treasury Committee

Found: John Glen: Yes.

Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - London School of Economics, Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), and New Economics Foundation

Treasury Committee

Found: John Glen: Yes.

Tuesday 17th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Institute for Fiscal Studies, Institute for Government, and London Business School

Treasury Committee

Found: Chair: Let us turn back to the spending review with Mr John Glen.

Tuesday 3rd June 2025
Oral Evidence - Cambridge University, TheCityUK, and Clifford Chance LLP

The UK-EU reset - European Affairs Committee

Found: When John Glen was C ity Minister, he ran 40 different consultations in terms of what would need to



Bill Documents
Jun. 20 2025
All proceedings up to 20 June 2025 at Report Stage
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26
Bill proceedings: Commons

Found: Victoria Collins Kenneth Stevenson Jonathan Davies Patricia Ferguson Simon Hoare Adam Jogee John Glen

Jun. 20 2025
Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 20 June 2025 - large print
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: ” _82 John Glen Rachael Maskell Dr Ben Spencer John Grady .

Jun. 20 2025
Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 20 June 2025
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: ” _82 John Glen Rachael Maskell Dr Ben Spencer John Grady .

Jun. 10 2025
All proceedings up to 10 June 2025 at Report Stage
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26
Bill proceedings: Commons

Found: Smith James Wild Greg Smith Gregory Stafford Joe Robertson Rebecca Smith Blake Stephenson John Glen




John Glen - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 8th July 2025 9:45 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Insurance companies
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
Alistair Hargreaves - CEO, UK Insurance at Admiral Group Plc
Jon Walker - CEO, AXA Commercial at AXA
Jason Storah - CEO, UK General Insurance at Aviva
Jeremy Ward - Managing Director, Insurance at Lloyds Banking Group, and Managing Director, General Insurance at Scottish Widows
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 1st July 2025 9 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National Wealth Fund
At 9:15am: Oral evidence
John Flint - Chief Executive at National Wealth Fund
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
The Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary to the Treasury at HM Treasury
Neeraj Patel - Deputy Director at HM Treasury
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 24th June 2025 9:45 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: AI in financial services
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
Professor Sandra Wachter - Professor of Technology and Regulation at University of Oxford
Professor Neil Lawrence - DeepMind Professor of Machine Learning at University of Cambridge
Professor Galina Andreeva - Personal Chair at Societal Aspects of Credit, and Director, Credit Research Centre at University of Edinburgh Business School
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 25th June 2025 9:45 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Spending Review 2025
At 10:00am: Oral evidence
Darren Jones MP - Chief Secretary to the Treasury at HM Treasury
Conrad Smewing - Director General, Public Spending at HM Treasury
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 15th July 2025 9:45 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Office for Budget Responsibility Fiscal Risks and Sustainability Report
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
Richard Hughes - Chair at Office for Budget Responsibility
Professor David Miles CBE - Member at Budget Responsibility Committee
Tom Josephs - Member at Budget Responsibility Committee
At 11:30am: Oral evidence
Richard Hughes - Chair at Office for Budget Responsibility
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 22nd July 2025 9:45 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Bank of England Financial Stability Reports
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
Andrew Bailey - Governor at Bank of England
Professor Randall Kroszner - External Member at Financial Policy Committee, Bank of England
Carolyn Wilkins - External Member at Financial Policy Committee, Bank of England
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 16th July 2025 2 p.m.
Treasury Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 1st July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Siemens Energy following oral evidence on our inquiry into the National Wealth Fund, dated 30 June 2025

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 1st July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from HM Revenue and Customs on security and customer service, dated 24 June 2025

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 1st July 2025
Correspondence - Annex D on HMRC Board Effectiveness Review 2024-25

Treasury Committee
Monday 30th June 2025
Report - 8th Report - Lifetime Individual Savings Account

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 1st July 2025
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 1st July 2025
Oral Evidence - National Wealth Fund

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th June 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from HM Revenue and Customs, on tax gap estimates for 2023 to 2024, dated 19 June 2025

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 25th June 2025
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th June 2025
Oral Evidence - University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, and Societal Aspects of Credit

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from the FCA following oral evidence on our inquiry into 'The work of the Financial Conduct Authority', dated 30 June 2025

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Allica Bank following oral evidence on our inquiry into 'Bank and building societies', dated 27 June 2025

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Meta on delays to compliance reported by the FCA, dated 27 June 2025

Treasury Committee
Saturday 12th July 2025
Special Report - 2nd Special Report - Acceptance of Cash: Government Response

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 8th July 2025
Oral Evidence - Admiral Group Plc, AXA, Aviva, and Lloyds Banking Group

Treasury Committee
Monday 14th July 2025
Report - 9th Report - Financial Ombudsman Service: Accountability to the House of Commons

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from ICE following oral evidence on our inquiry into the National Wealth Fund

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 17th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Institute for Fiscal Studies, Institute for Government, and London Business School

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Written Evidence - Airlines UK
NWF0047 - National Wealth Fund

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - London School of Economics, Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), and New Economics Foundation

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Siemens Energy UK&I and Siemens Gamesa UK, Future Energy Networks, and First Light Fusion

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th June 2025
Oral Evidence - Orbex, Green Alliance, and UK BioIndustry Association

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Oral Evidence - Office for Budget Responsibility

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Oral Evidence - Office for Budget Responsibility, Budget Responsibility Committee, and Budget Responsibility Committee

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Report - 10th Report - Re-appointment of Richard Hughes as Chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Report - Audit Transformation Programme (ATP) – Hubs and Insights

Public Accounts Commission Committee
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Report - NAO Auditor’s 2024 Value for Money Study – Audit Transformation Programme (ATP)

Public Accounts Commission Committee
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Written Evidence - Richard Hughes Questionnaire
RAPPRH0002 - Reappointment of Richard Hughes as Chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Correspondence - Correspondence from Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England, following oral evidence on the 'Bank of England Monetary Policy Reports', dated 4 July 2025

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 15th July 2025
Written Evidence - Richard Hughes CV
RAPPRH0001 - Reappointment of Richard Hughes as Chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility

Treasury Committee