John Glen - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for John Glen

Information between 9th March 2026 - 19th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Glen voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292

Speeches
John Glen speeches from: Youth Unemployment John Glen contributed 1 speech (140 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions
John Glen speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions John Glen contributed 1 speech (71 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Defence
John Glen speeches from: Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address John Glen contributed 1 speech (91 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office
John Glen speeches from: Business of the House John Glen contributed 1 speech (108 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House
John Glen speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions John Glen contributed 2 speeches (104 words) Tuesday 10th March 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury
John Glen speeches from: Middle East: Economic Update John Glen contributed 1 speech (23 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury

Written Answers
Parents: Advisory Services Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury) Thursday 12th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of whether the approval process for parenting interventions outside the Best Start Family Hubs approved menu enables local authorities to commission programmes delivered by voluntary, faith-based and community organisations; and what steps her Department is taking to support a wider range of parenting interventions reflecting local community needs. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department is clear that local authorities should commission parenting programmes with a strong and credible evidence base, ensuring families receive support that improves outcomes and increases the proportion of children achieving a good level of development nationally. To support this, the Best Start in Life programme provides an approved menu of evidence‑based parenting interventions, giving local areas confidence that commissioned programmes are effective and represent value for money. The department has also ensured appropriate flexibility, so that where a local authority can demonstrate that a programme outside the approved menu has a robust evidence base and meets local need, it has been considered. Evidence‑based parenting programmes are one part of a wider offer of high-quality support to families. Also included are stay‑and‑play opportunities, low‑intensity parenting, peer‑support activities, and strong outreach. The department encourages local authorities to work with voluntary, community and faith organisations, while ensuring that any programmes they deliver, meet clear evidence standards.
Parents: Advisory Services Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury) Thursday 12th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of whether evidentiary requirements attached to parenting interventions in the Best Start Family Hubs programme affect the ability of local authorities to commission parenting programmes that are not included in the approved menu of interventions. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department is clear that local authorities should commission parenting programmes with a strong and credible evidence base, ensuring families receive support that improves outcomes and increases the proportion of children achieving a good level of development nationally. To support this, the Best Start in Life programme provides an approved menu of evidence‑based parenting interventions, giving local areas confidence that commissioned programmes are effective and represent value for money. The department has also ensured appropriate flexibility, so that where a local authority can demonstrate that a programme outside the approved menu has a robust evidence base and meets local need, it has been considered. Evidence‑based parenting programmes are one part of a wider offer of high-quality support to families. Also included are stay‑and‑play opportunities, low‑intensity parenting, peer‑support activities, and strong outreach. The department encourages local authorities to work with voluntary, community and faith organisations, while ensuring that any programmes they deliver, meet clear evidence standards.

Written Answers

Parents: Advisory Services
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Thursday 12th March 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of whether the approval process for parenting interventions outside the Best Start Family Hubs approved menu enables local authorities to commission programmes delivered by voluntary, faith-based and community organisations; and what steps her Department is taking to support a wider range of parenting interventions reflecting local community needs.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

The department is clear that local authorities should commission parenting programmes with a strong and credible evidence base, ensuring families receive support that improves outcomes and increases the proportion of children achieving a good level of development nationally. To support this, the Best Start in Life programme provides an approved menu of evidence‑based parenting interventions, giving local areas confidence that commissioned programmes are effective and represent value for money.

The department has also ensured appropriate flexibility, so that where a local authority can demonstrate that a programme outside the approved menu has a robust evidence base and meets local need, it has been considered.

Evidence‑based parenting programmes are one part of a wider offer of high-quality support to families. Also included are stay‑and‑play opportunities, low‑intensity parenting, peer‑support activities, and strong outreach. The department encourages local authorities to work with voluntary, community and faith organisations, while ensuring that any programmes they deliver, meet clear evidence standards.

Parents: Advisory Services
Asked by: John Glen (Conservative - Salisbury)
Thursday 12th March 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of whether evidentiary requirements attached to parenting interventions in the Best Start Family Hubs programme affect the ability of local authorities to commission parenting programmes that are not included in the approved menu of interventions.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

John Glen mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
9 Mar 2026, 5:17 p.m. - House of Commons " John Glen. Given it was promised at the start of June last year, when will the Chancellor sign off on the Defence Investment Plan? " Rt Hon John Glen MP (Salisbury, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
10 Mar 2026, 11:58 a.m. - House of Commons " John Glen. >> John Glen. >> Number five, Mr. Speaker. This time. >> Mr. speaker, at the Spring " Q5. Whether she has made an assessment of the potential impact of the Office for Budget Responsibility's growth projections for 2026 on future Departmental spending levels. (908181) - View Video - View Transcript
10 Mar 2026, 11:59 a.m. - House of Commons " John Glen Secretary for his answer. But given the Chancellor has pencilled in 0.3% real terms growth in 2013, public spending and assuming health is spent at a " Rt Hon John Glen MP (Salisbury, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
12 Mar 2026, 11:26 a.m. - House of Commons "people, like my hon. Friend, on these matters, because he is. He does bring a loud and strong voice does bring a loud and strong voice to John Glen. " Ian Lavery MP (Blyth and Ashington, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Mar 2026, 3:43 p.m. - House of Commons "sure the Secretary for war, Pete Hegseth, had from me direct on behalf of the UK people. >> John Glen thank you, Mr. Speaker. " Peter Prinsley MP (Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Mar 2026, 3:43 p.m. - House of Commons ">> John Glen thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Secretary of State is a former distinguished Treasury Minister, and government is about taking " Peter Prinsley MP (Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Mar 2026, 5:06 p.m. - House of Commons " John Glen thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Of course, nobody Deputy Speaker. Of course, nobody would expect the government to contravene the indications of the " Rt Hon Darren Jones MP, Minister of State (Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister) (Bristol North West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
17 Mar 2026, 3:37 p.m. - House of Commons " John Glen thank you, Madam. " Rt Hon Pat McFadden MP, The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Wolverhampton South East, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript

Parliamentary Debates
Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address 71 speeches (6,315 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Darren Jones (Lab - Bristol North West) Friend the Member for Salisbury (John Glen), is that all documents that the Government have and are able - Link to Speech
Fire Station Closures 17 speeches (4,038 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Andrew Murrison (Con - South West Wiltshire) Friend the Member for Salisbury (John Glen), who is concerned about Wilton, has written to the Minister - Link to Speech
Oral Answers to Questions 146 speeches (10,285 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Torsten Bell (Lab - Swansea West) Friends the Members for Salisbury (John Glen) and for Godalming and Ash (Sir Jeremy Hunt) have called - Link to Speech

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 11th March 2026 Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury Treasury Committee Found: Q100 John Glen: Chancellor, could we turn to growth?
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Office for Budget Responsibility, Office for Budget Responsibility, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Institute for Government, St James Place, and Energy Aspects Treasury Committee Found: Q21 John Glen: 0.1% next year and 0.1% the following year?

John Glen - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Monday 16th March 2026 1:30 p.m. Treasury Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 17th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Treasury Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The OBR: 15 years on View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 18th March 2026 2 p.m. Treasury Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Financial Ombudsman Service View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 24th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Treasury Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Financial Conduct Authority View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 25th March 2026 2 p.m. Treasury Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Financial Inclusion Strategy View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026 2 p.m. Public Accounts Commission - Oral evidence Subject: National Audit Office Main Estimates 2026-27 At 2:15pm: Oral evidence Gareth Davies - Comptroller and Auditor General at National Audit Office Dame Fiona Reynolds DBE - Chair at National Audit Office Rebecca Sheeran - Chief Operating Officer at National Audit Office View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 15th April 2026 2 p.m. Treasury Committee - Private Meeting Subject: Appointment of Katharine Braddick as Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England and Chief Executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority View calendar - Add to calendar

Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Managing Director of the Payment Systems Regulator, in response to the Chair’s follow up, dated 27 Feb 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from Chancellor of the Exchequer on the Spring Forecast 2026, dated 3 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Economic Secretary to the Treasury on changes to the Financial Inclusion Committee, dated 4 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Managing Director of the Payment Systems Regulator, on follow-up to 4 February oral evidence session, dated 13 February 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chancellor on the appointment of new Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation and Chief Executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority, dated 27 February 2026 Treasury Committee
Wednesday 11th March 2026 Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, and HM Treasury Treasury Committee
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Office for Budget Responsibility, Office for Budget Responsibility, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Institute for Government, St James Place, and Energy Aspects Treasury Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, in response to the Chair’s follow-up questions, dated 10 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to Lloyds on reports of IT failure, dated 17 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury in relation to follow-up from 11 February oral evidence, dated 26 February 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from HMRC on update on Child Benefit compliance exercise, dated 13 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, relating to changes in appointment process of FOS Chair, dated 18 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Institute of Economic Affairs, New Economics Foundation, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, and Resolution Foundation Treasury Committee
Wednesday 18th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Financial Ombudsman Service, Financial Ombudsman Service, and Financial Ombudsman Service Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the FCA on its initial review of the withdrawal of the Family Protection Plan, dated 19 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Economic Secretary to the Treasury on reforms to the credit union common bond, dated 18 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from the Bank of England on its response to the Artificial intelligence in financial services, dated 16 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Wednesday 25th March 2026 Attendance statistics - Treasury Committee attendance for Session 2024–26, as at 13 February 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, and Financial Conduct Authority Treasury Committee
Friday 27th March 2026 Correspondence - Correspondence from Lloyds Banking Group in response to Chair’s letter on IT incident, dated 24 March 2026 Treasury Committee
Tuesday 24th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, and Financial Conduct Authority Treasury Committee
Wednesday 25th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Money and Mental Health Policy Institute, The Money Charity, Good Things Foundation, and Fair4All Finance Treasury Committee
Tuesday 31st March 2026 Estimate memoranda - NAO Vote on Account 2026-27 Public Accounts Commission Committee