All 2 Debates between John Hayes and Alison Seabeck

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between John Hayes and Alison Seabeck
Thursday 14th March 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
John Hayes Portrait Mr Hayes
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend has been a powerful champion of his constituents in this regard, as have my hon. Friends the Members for Sherwood (Mr Spencer) and for North Warwickshire (Dan Byles) of their constituents. I will, indeed, do what has been asked. In fact, I already have: there will be a bespoke tailored event run with local colleges, local authorities and Jobcentre Plus aimed at providing new job opportunities and reskilling for those who find themselves made redundant.

Alison Seabeck Portrait Alison Seabeck (Plymouth, Moor View) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Hills fuel poverty review said that unless the Government changed course a further 200,000 families would be in fuel poverty within four years. Does the Secretary of State agree with the Hills conclusions, and if not, will he place in the Library the evidence on which he is basing his views?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between John Hayes and Alison Seabeck
Thursday 14th October 2010

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Hayes Portrait The Minister for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning (Mr John Hayes)
- Hansard - -

Like my hon. Friend, I care about growers and farmers, because of the constituency I represent and because I know the difference that they make to our nation. Mindful of the concerns he expressed, and of others like them, I have already asked officials to work with the sector skills council in this area to see what further apprenticeship programmes can be developed in agriculture and related subjects.

Alison Seabeck Portrait Alison Seabeck (Plymouth, Moor View) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

T4. What action is the Minister taking, alongside his colleagues in the Department for Communities and Local Government, to prevent the regional economy of the south-west from entering a slump because of the parochial disagreements in the region? Or are DCLG and businesses unable to agree, in the same way that the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats seem unable to agree in the south-west?