Immigration and Asylum Bill (Seventh sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office
Tuesday 20th October 2026

(1 day, 9 hours ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Anna Turley Portrait Anna Turley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his questions and I will say a lot more about those issues when I respond to the contributions by the hon. Member for Brighton Pavilion. However, we are absolutely clear that we are not going to penalise people for experiencing hardship. These reforms preserve protections for vulnerable people and children, but it is vital that we make it clear that immigration control and the wider public interest should be given proper weight in any consideration. This is about restoring balance, not removing safeguards. That is critical.

Jonathan Brash Portrait Mr Jonathan Brash (Hartlepool) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Having listened to some contributions, particularly from the hon. Member for Brighton Pavilion, I think that most fair-minded people would be concerned that these reforms could have a detrimental impact on children. Can the Minister confirm whether or not these reforms remove protections for children?

Anna Turley Portrait Anna Turley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend raises a critical issue that is, of course, dear to all of our hearts. Again, I will say more about it later, but these reforms absolutely do not remove protections for children. The best interests of children will continue to remain a primary consideration in immigration decision making, as they should be. The reforms in clause 19 ensure that children’s interests are considered alongside other important factors, including compliance with immigration law and the wider public interest in maintaining an effective immigration system.