Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill

Judith Cummins Excerpts
2nd reading
Tuesday 17th March 2026

(4 months, 4 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Act 2026 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Oliver Dowden Portrait Sir Oliver Dowden (Hertsmere) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I may be at risk of making myself fantastically unpopular, but I think I can do so having no prospect whatsoever of reaching ministerial office again. Although I am perfectly willing to admit that the previous Government did not do this, does the Paymaster General agree that a Government will at some point have to reconsider the constant freezing of the ministerial salary? It has to increase, or we will get to the point of there being no meaningful reward for ministerial office, which I think could have a detrimental impact on the calibre of people we can attract over the long term. He is being very bold on this, so why not be bold with ministerial salaries?

Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Judith Cummins)
- Hansard - -

Order. I remind the House that what we are discussing—and what is in scope—is the number of ministerial appointments, not the salaries of Ministers.

Nick Thomas-Symonds Portrait Nick Thomas-Symonds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If ever Ministers were looking for a trade union leader, we have found one in the right hon. Member for Hertsmere (Sir Oliver Dowden). Having already held very high office and been Deputy Prime Minister, he should perhaps worry less about future ambitions.

--- Later in debate ---
Gavin Williamson Portrait Sir Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely agree with the hon. Gentleman. There is a disconnect between all the priorities and all the issues around the world and our wanting to pass legislation to create more ministerial offices.

I also understand and appreciate the challenges that the Prime Minister will face. I am sympathetic to his position, because he will be constantly badgered to make more Ministers, with more people wanting patronage and elevation. As my right hon. Friend the Member for New Forest East (Sir Julian Lewis) has pointed out, there is no upper limit to the number of Ministers, so if we are in this House in 10 years’ time, we will be having a debate about how there are another 15 Ministers who are unpaid. The Government Minister will be at the Dispatch Box, possibly trying to defend the idea of paying even more Ministers. We will have a creep, creep, creep of patronage, with ever more people going on to the Government payroll. I feel, and I fear, that that may weaken this House.

Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Judith Cummins)
- Hansard - -

I call the shadow Minister.

Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Bill

Judith Cummins Excerpts
3rd reading
Tuesday 17th March 2026

(4 months, 4 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Ministerial Salaries (Amendment) Act 2026 Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Judith Cummins Portrait The First Deputy Chairman
- Hansard - -

With this it will be convenient to consider clause 2 stand part.

Nick Thomas-Symonds Portrait The Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office (Nick Thomas-Symonds)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mrs Cummins, as I open the proceedings in the Committee of the whole House. I set out the core arguments for this Bill in my Second Reading speech, so I will not rehearse them again, although I have not matched the Teddy Taylor standard from 1975. However, for the benefit of the Committee, I will outline the two clauses and why they should stand part of the Bill.

Clause 1 amends paragraph 2 of part V of schedule 1 to the Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975, which determines the maximum number of salaries that may be paid to certain ministerial office holders. Sub-paragraph (a) replaces the previous provision for 21 salaries at Secretary of State rank with a new provision for 22 salaries, sub-paragraph (b) replaces the previous provision for 50 salaries at Secretary of State rank and Minister of State rank with a new provision for 54 salaries, and sub-paragraph (c) replaces the previous provision for 83 salaries at Secretary of State rank, Minister of State rank and Parliamentary Secretary rank with a new provision of 94 salaries. This increases the total number of ministerial salaries available by 11. As I have said, the new limits are cumulative, meaning that the Prime Minister has the discretion to allocate salaries to a large number of Ministers at more junior ranks within those limits, if so desired.

Clause 2 sets out the extent, commencement and short title of the Bill. The Bill extends to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Of course, the Bill comes into force on Royal Assent. I very much look forward to the rest of the debate and seeing the Bill on the statute book soon.

Judith Cummins Portrait The First Deputy Chairman
- Hansard - -

I call the shadow Minister.

Alex Burghart Portrait Alex Burghart (Brentwood and Ongar) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have just a few short remarks. First, it would be helpful if the Minister set out how the Government have come to the totals that they have come to: why one, four and nine in total? Why not fewer, and why not more? Secondly, I did not quite get the Dispatch Box commitment I was looking for that this would mark an end to unpaid ministerial posts in this Government. [Interruption.] There is a little bit of a debate on the Government Front Bench about whether that commitment was made, but if the Paymaster General would be crystal clear, we can all go home happy.