Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Karl McCartney

Main Page: Karl McCartney (Conservative - Lincoln)

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill

Karl McCartney Excerpts
Monday 20th May 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Maria Miller Portrait Maria Miller
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Let me gently point out to my hon. Friend that what we are trying to do is provide access to marriage for a group of people who have not had that access to date. It is clear that there is an inequality affecting individuals who are in same-sex relationships and who have not had access to marriage.

We are not trying to create two tiers of marriage; we are trying to right a wrong of the past. It does not strike me as entirely logical to want to delay the Bill and give rise to more debate in the other place and more issues involving policy development in order to provide for something that straight couples would not necessarily want anyway. We do not have the evidence base that that would require, and the research that has been carried out so far suggests that we do not have a clear line of sight in terms of the end result.

Karl McCartney Portrait Karl MᶜCartney (Lincoln) (Con)
- Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend is being very gracious in giving way. Does she not accept that there is an inequality in the fact that same-sex couples will have a choice between a civil partnership and a gay marriage, whereas heterosexual couples will not have that choice? Are not the Government creating that inequality?

Maria Miller Portrait Maria Miller
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There is currently a glaring inequality, in that same-sex couples have no access to the civil marriage that those of us who are in heterosexual relationships take granted. That is the issue with which the Bill is designed to deal. What the review will do is examine the issue of civil partnerships in more detail to ensure that if there is a requirement for them, we can deal with it in a measured manner.