Ambassadors: Vetting Process Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon

Main Page: Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative - Life peer)

Ambassadors: Vetting Process

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Excerpts
Tuesday 10th February 2026

(1 week, 3 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, I experienced the process for many years. Even as a Minister of State you gave references and had views, but ultimately it was a decision taken by the Foreign Secretary and then passed on to the Prime Minister—that process is very much established. I pay tribute to other Permanent Under-Secretaries who sit in your Lordships’ House and from whom I learned the process. Surely the fix here is that any political appointment, irrespective of the Government, is also put through that very same vetting process. That will resolve many of the issues the Government are now facing.

Baroness Chapman of Darlington Portrait Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My understanding is that that is the case. I think the only difference here is around the timing of the vetting and the announcing; the actual vetting process was the same. There is now another process about making sure that the documents we all need to see in order to assure ourselves of this are available, because this is a public confidence issue as well. I hope that can be done in good time, and the ISC has taken responsibility for doing that.