China Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Collins of Highbury

Main Page: Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour - Life peer)

China

Lord Collins of Highbury Excerpts
Thursday 14th July 2022

(1 year, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I, too, thank my noble friend for initiating this short but vital debate. Increased aggressive rhetoric combined with human rights abuses in Hong Kong and Xinjiang illustrate the long-term security challenges which the Government of China pose. It is now clear that President Xi is intent on controlling Taiwan in some form, even if he is reluctant to go to war like Putin has in Ukraine. Our relationship with China must therefore centre on pragmatism and be alert to the security risks which it poses.

I was very pleased to read the report by the International Relations and Defence Committee, published last year, which laid out the clear case for a consistent written strategy setting out the Government’s security relationship with China. As long as Ministers maintain their policy of ambiguity, we cannot be confident that they are properly balancing the need for economic engagement with the importance of the UK’s interests and values. Unfortunately, the response to the report gave no further indication of a wide-ranging strategy—far from it. Instead, there were only piecemeal points about the UK’s interests and values. It focused on things such as it being important to avoid strategic dependency on China.

The Government argued that the National Security Council provided a clear direction for the their China policy and that it was supported by the work of the integrated review. I have no criticisms of the direction of the pathway of the integrated review, although we have some issues in terms of the tilt in the light of Russian aggression. I agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, who wrote a follow-up letter in which she said that the ambiguity and uncertainty was

“damaging to businesses and detrimental to our partnerships and alliances in the region”.

In particular she wrote that it was unclear how the Government intended to balance human rights issues with its economic relationship with China,

and

“how it will prioritise when these considerations clash.”

In response to the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, Amanda Milling said:

“We will uphold our values and protect our national security while promoting a positive and reliable trading relationship.”


Can the Minister tell us exactly what is the extensive programme of engagement with UK businesses to ensure that the UK’s policy is fully understood? I think most noble Lords want to hear from the Minister some concrete examples.