Covid-19 Vaccination: Coronary Disease Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Covid-19 Vaccination: Coronary Disease

Lord Davies of Brixton Excerpts
Tuesday 23rd April 2024

(3 weeks, 4 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Markham Portrait Lord Markham (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The main thing that the vaccine did was prevent any bad effects if you did get Covid. While it might not have reduced transmission much, its main benefit was that it reduced the effects if you had it, as well as hospitalisations and deaths. Making Covid a less serious disease, basically, enabled us to open up the country and we were one of the first to get going again because we knew that the disease no longer posed the high risk that it did before we had the vaccines.

Lord Davies of Brixton Portrait Lord Davies of Brixton (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I have some personal experience here. One week after I had my first course of Covid vaccination, I had an attack of pericarditis and ended up in St Thomas’ Hospital. I am convinced that there is a link, but it is important to look at the longer-term effects—having an attack of Covid causes more heart problems, as well as having a long-term impact on your general health.

Lord Markham Portrait Lord Markham (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord is absolutely correct. The MHRA study on heart inflammation, which he mentioned, said that there is that side-effect for one to two people per 100,000—unfortunately, the noble Lord seems to have been one of them. However, if you get Covid it affects 150 people per 100,000. On balance, if you have not had the vaccination, your risk is 22 per 100,000. The statistics are very clear.