National Insurance Contributions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Grade of Yarmouth

Main Page: Lord Grade of Yarmouth (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

National Insurance Contributions

Lord Grade of Yarmouth Excerpts
Monday 7th March 2022

(2 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, as I explained in my original Answer, the 6.1 million individuals earning less than the primary threshold will not pay the levy at all. In addition, in the analysis that I mentioned earlier, if you take the package together, both the levy and the spending that is ring-fenced for the health and social care system, lower-income households will be the largest net beneficiaries from this package, with the poorest households gaining the most.

Lord Grade of Yarmouth Portrait Lord Grade of Yarmouth (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend the Minister agree with me that those who call for a windfall on the oil companies would in fact be penalising the shareholders? And who are the shareholders? They are the pensioners of this country—they are the one who hold most of the shares in these oil companies.

Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we have strayed more on to a windfall tax than I expected, but I say to my noble friend that he makes a good point. The issue of energy security is at the top of people’s minds at the moment. The Government see gas, for example, as part of our transition towards net zero. We want to allow people to invest in our North Sea oil and gas fields as part of that, so a windfall tax could also have a negative impact on that.