Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Hardie
Main Page: Lord Hardie (Crossbench - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Hardie's debates with the Home Office
(3 days ago)
Lords ChamberThe noble Lord, Lord Empey, will know that the Government keep all matters under review at all times—that is the political, Civil Service direct answer in response to this matter. I assure him that, from my perspective, our international obligations are extremely important. That does not mean that we cannot examine how we interpret those actions. That does not mean that we cannot examine the measures in this Bill, announced by my right honourable friend this week, and the direct executive actions we can take around hotel use and other things, to ensure that we put some pressure and energy into the system to achieve—let us end on a united note—the objective of all Members of this House to have a resolution to people being exploited by criminal gangs, in small boats, subverting immigration and asylum systems in the United Kingdom. With that, I hope noble Lords will reflect on my comments and do the right thing.
My Lords, I may have misunderstood him, but did the Minister say that the Government would consider derogating from Article 3?
I know that. I may have misunderstood what the Minister said, but, if that was the case, I point out that that is not possible.
The intervention that I took invited me to examine that issue. I have said I will examine it, but, as I said in response to that question, the focus of the Government as a whole is on Article 8. We anticipate energising the review of Article 8 to ensure that we examine how it is currently interpreted, what actions are taken as a result of the article, and whether further guidance needs to be issued about those matters. In response to the intervention as to whether I would look at Article 3, I have said that I will look at the point that was made then. The focus of the Government is Article 8.